375 Georgia car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was traveling on Morgan Falls Road when another driver made an improper left turn and struck a third vehicle. The third vehicle then collided with the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries and sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering.

One driver was hit by another driver while making a turn. The collision caused one vehicle to strike the side of the other.

One driver exited a driveway and struck the other driver's vehicle. The injured person sustained a bulging lumbar disc injury and underwent physical therapy.

One driver failed to slow down on the highway during stopped traffic, causing a rear-end collision. The case resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff.

One driver allegedly struck the rear of another vehicle. The driver who was hit sued, claiming the other driver was negligent. The defendant argued the plaintiffs did not state their damages properly. One plaintiff was later dismissed from the case. A jury found in favor of the remaining plaintiff.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle because they failed to notice traffic slowing down. The driver who caused the crash was cited for following too closely. The injured driver suffered pain and suffering and had medical bills. The case went to trial, and the jury awarded compensation for medical expenses and pain and suffering.

One driver struck another vehicle from behind, pushing it into a third vehicle. The driver who initiated the collision was alleged to be following too closely and driving too fast for conditions. The collision resulted in serious personal injuries and medical expenses for one of the drivers.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle at a stop light. The injured person sustained back injuries.

One driver was a passenger in a vehicle when the other driver collided with the rear of their car. The passenger alleged the other driver was negligent and caused the collision. The passenger suffered injuries and incurred medical expenses. The defense questioned the extent and causation of the injuries. A jury found in favor of the passenger.

One driver filed a lawsuit against another driver after a car accident. The case involved uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. The defendant denied being an uninsured or underinsured motorist and raised several defenses, including failure to state a claim and issues with process and jurisdiction. After a trial, the jury found in favor of the plaintiff, and a judgment was entered. The judgment was later satisfied.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The collision caused injuries. A jury determined one defendant was 70% at fault and another defendant was 30% at fault.

One driver hit another vehicle from behind at an intersection. The driver who was hit experienced neck and back pain. The award was reduced by pip benefits.