2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

A driver stopped at a red light was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to her neck, back, and hips, requiring multiple surgeries and ongoing pain management. The other driver's employer was also named as a defendant. The defense argued the plaintiff's injuries were from subsequent incidents or pre-existing conditions.

A driver was killed when his vehicle struck a steel plate extending from the back of an 18-wheeler. The truck was stopped in a crossover lane at night, and the load was partially blocking the driver's lane. The driver's family sued the trucking company, the transportation broker, and others, alleging negligence in how the load was transported and secured. Some defendants settled before trial, and the jury found others negligent.

A rear-end collision occurred involving a postal inspector's vehicle. The crash resulted in injuries to the lower back of one of the individuals involved.

One driver was proceeding through an intersection when the other driver ran a red light and struck their vehicle. The second driver was found to be under the influence of alcohol. The injured driver sustained a serious head injury requiring surgery and continues to experience complications.

One driver was traveling on a highway when another driver rear-ended his pickup truck, causing it to roll over. The injured driver claimed injuries to his neck and back. The case went to trial, and the jury found the defendant driver negligent and awarded damages.

A passenger died in a multi-vehicle collision on Highway 183 in Austin. The collision involved two vehicles that were pushed into northbound lanes and struck by another car. The family of the deceased sued the drivers and their employers, alleging negligence in operation, distraction, and failure to train and monitor drivers. The defense admitted to following too closely but argued that cell phone use and training did not contribute to the crash. The jury found one driver and his employer mostly at fault.

A passenger died in a multi-vehicle collision on Highway 183 in Austin. The collision involved two vehicles, one of which was towing a trailer. The impact pushed one vehicle into oncoming traffic, where it was struck by another vehicle. The family of the deceased passenger sued the drivers and their employers, alleging negligence in operation, speed, lookout, and distraction. The defendants argued that while one driver was following too closely, other factors like cell phone use and equipment towing did not contribute to the crash. The jury found one driver and his employer primarily at fault.

A motorcyclist was killed when he collided with a vehicle exiting a driveway. The motorcyclist's estate and his partner sued the vehicle driver's employer, alleging negligence. The defense argued the motorcyclist was speeding. The case involved a dispute over the common law marriage of the deceased and his partner. Damages were sought for wrongful death and funeral expenses.

A man died after his car ran out of gas and he pulled over to the side of the road. While he was refueling his vehicle, another driver struck him. The deceased man's family sued the establishment where the other driver had been drinking, alleging they overserved him alcohol, leading to the fatal collision. The family also claimed emotional distress from witnessing the incident.

One driver was rear-ended by another driver in a collision. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their neck and lower back. The other driver and their employer were found responsible for the collision. The injured driver sought medical treatment, including injections, and claimed ongoing pain and impairment. The defense argued the collision caused only minor injuries and disputed the need for extensive future treatment.

A driver was stopped at a traffic signal when the vehicle behind him, an 18-wheeler, rear-ended his pickup truck. The driver of the pickup truck claimed he suffered neck injuries, including a herniated disc, which caused radiating pain and numbness. He underwent various treatments, including physical therapy and injections, and sought compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and pain and suffering. The defense disputed the cause of the injuries and the severity of the impact.

One driver was backing a trailer across the road under unsafe conditions. The other driver was unable to stop in time and collided with the trailer. The injured driver underwent multiple surgeries and rehabilitation for fractures and other injuries. The driver claimed inability to stand or walk for long periods, impacting work and childcare.