Travis County Wrongful Death Collision Settles for $2.1 Million
A motorcyclist was killed when he collided with a vehicle exiting a driveway. The motorcyclist's estate and his partner sued the vehicle driver's employer, alleging negligence. The defense argued the motorcyclist was speeding. The case involved a dispute over the common law marriage of the deceased and his partner. Damages were sought for wrongful death and funeral expenses.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Wrongful Death Injuries
Wrongful death claims arise when a car accident fatality is caused by another party's negligence. These cases compensate surviving family members for their losses and the decedent's pain and suffering.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $2,100,000
- County
- Travis County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Motorcycle
- Case Type
- Death
Settlement Context
This settlement of $2,100,000 is near the median of $1,850,000 for wrongful death cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $504,000 to $3,020,000, based on 41 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On January 4, 2016, a collision occurred on Howard Lane in Travis County, Texas, resulting in two fatalities. A restaurant worker, operating a motorcycle, struck the side of a vehicle driven by an employee of a technology company. Both the motorcycle rider and the company employee died upon impact.
The motorcycle rider's mother, on behalf of his estate, and his common-law wife subsequently filed a lawsuit against the technology company. They alleged the defendant company's employee was negligent, claiming failure to keep a proper lookout, failure to yield the right of way, and failure to brake or turn to avoid the collision. Plaintiffs' counsel presented crash data indicating the defendant's driver did not stop before exiting the driveway. They also noted the motorcycle's bright color, suggesting visibility. The plaintiffs sought damages for wrongful death, including pecuniary losses, loss of companionship, mental anguish, and funeral expenses.
The defendant company contended that the motorcycle rider was contributorily negligent for exceeding the 50-mph speed limit by 10 mph. The plaintiffs conceded that the motorcycle rider was 10 percent responsible for the accident. Early in the case, the court determined the validity of the common-law marriage based on evidence presented, including the couple wearing rings, entering joint contracts, living together, and being recognized as married by friends and family.
The case concluded in mediation with a settlement of $2.1 million. The defendant company held a $1 million primary insurance policy and a $21 million excess policy.
Understanding This Case
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Travis County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Travis County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.