Leg / Foot Injury Settlements:
Real Case Outcomes & Data

A storage tank designed and manufactured by the defendant toppled and struck a man in his early 40s, causing severe leg fractures. The plaintiff claimed the tank's design was unstable, leading to the incident. He stated he required multiple surgeries, experienced permanent pain and a limp, and could no longer work in a physical capacity. The plaintiff also reported suffering from PTSD. The defendant argued the tank was properly designed and that misuse by the employer caused the accident.

A truck driver was injured when a water tank fell on his leg. The tank was part of a road reclamation system. The driver sued the system's manufacturer, alleging defects in its design and warnings. The manufacturer argued the tank was safe when delivered and was damaged by improper use. The jury found the manufacturer liable for design and marketing defects.

One driver backed up a trailer, causing a car crash. The crash resulted in leg injuries for one person.

One driver was backing a trailer across the road under unsafe conditions. The other driver was unable to stop in time and collided with the trailer. The injured driver underwent multiple surgeries and rehabilitation for fractures and other injuries. The driver claimed inability to stand or walk for long periods, impacting work and childcare.

One driver was riding a motorcycle on a highway when another driver attempted to turn and struck the motorcycle. The impact resulted in the amputation of the rider's left foot. The rider was hospitalized for treatment and physical therapy.

One driver lost control of his pickup truck and camper trailer on a dark, rainy highway, causing it to stop in the road. Another truck driver, who did not see the disabled vehicle until it was too late, collided with the pickup. The driver of the pickup sustained injuries to his foot, neck, and back.

A motorcyclist was riding on a street when a car turned in front of him, causing a collision. The motorcyclist sustained injuries to his legs and wrist, along with road rash. The driver of the car was a minor who did not have a license and was driving a vehicle from his father's used-car lot. The lawsuit alleged negligence in the operation of the vehicle and negligent entrustment. The defense argued the motorcyclist was speeding and driving recklessly.

One driver was helping another move items when a repo driver arrived. The second driver got into his truck and reversed at a high speed, running over the first driver's foot and ankle. The injured driver suffered a fractured tibia and fibula, requiring surgery and causing ongoing pain.

One driver was traveling east on a boulevard in rainy conditions when he collided with the rear of a construction vehicle. The driver claimed the construction vehicle had no lights or warning signs, making it difficult to see. The defense argued the driver was speeding and potentially intoxicated. The driver sustained fractures and later developed an infection requiring multiple surgeries.

One driver was operating a vehicle on a public road during rainy, dark conditions. The other party was operating heavy construction equipment on the same road. The driver collided with the rear of the construction equipment. Both parties were found to be negligent, with the injured driver bearing the majority of the fault.

One driver was operating a vehicle on a public road at night in rainy conditions. The other drivers were operating heavy construction equipment on the same road. The first driver collided with the rear of the construction equipment. The jury found both parties negligent.

One driver was traveling east on a highway when their vehicle collided head-on with another vehicle traveling west. The driver traveling west had reportedly been drinking. The driver traveling east sustained multiple broken bones in their leg and foot, requiring surgery and extensive physical therapy. They experienced ongoing pain, stiffness, and limited mobility, impacting their ability to work and pursue hobbies.