One driver was traveling north and the other was traveling south. The southbound driver attempted to turn left and collided with the northbound vehicle. The northbound driver claimed injuries to his back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the southbound driver was negligent in making the turn. The southbound driver claimed the northbound driver ran a red light, while the northbound driver claimed the southbound driver had a green arrow. The jury found the southbound driver liable for the accident.
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the vehicle in front of it. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck.
One driver was traveling eastbound when the other driver struck the rear of their vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious neck and back injuries that would require future surgery. The other driver argued that the stop was sudden and unexpected, and that the injuries were pre-existing. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering.
One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while driving on a toll road. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their neck and back. The driver who caused the collision was found to be texting and distracted at the time of the crash. The jury found the distracted driver fully liable for the collision.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The jury found the defendant driver negligent and awarded damages for past physical pain, mental anguish, and impairment.
One driver was traveling east on a toll road when the vehicle behind him struck his car. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to his neck and back. The driver who hit him claimed the other driver stopped suddenly. Evidence showed the driver who hit the car was texting on his cell phone just before the collision. The jury found the texting driver 100 percent liable.
One driver was turning right on a red light and struck the side of another vehicle. The second vehicle then struck a median curb. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries, including disc protrusions and nerve impingement. The case proceeded to trial, with the defense stipulating to liability but challenging the extent and causation of the injuries.
One driver stopped at a red light was hit from behind by the other driver. The impact pushed the stopped vehicle forward. The driver who was hit suffered serious injuries. The driver who admitted fault was found negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury awarded damages to the injured driver.
One driver was leaving a stop sign in a parking lot when they collided with another vehicle. The first driver claimed head and shoulder injuries. The other driver stated they were inching out of a parking space and the first driver was speeding. The police report indicated the second driver admitted to hitting the first driver.
One driver was approaching a stoplight when the other driver turned left, causing a collision. The injured driver claimed head, neck, leg, and abdomen injuries. Medical bills totaled over $41,000, and lost wages were claimed. The case settled before trial.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was hit from behind by another car. The person in the stopped car claimed serious neck and back injuries. They had already settled with the driver who hit them and then sought additional benefits from their own insurance company, which had denied the claim. The insurance company argued the initial settlement was sufficient. A jury found the injured person was owed damages for past pain and medical expenses, plus future pain and suffering.
Dallas County • 2021
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
