A person was walking when they were struck from behind by a pick-up truck. The injured person alleged the driver was negligent and under the influence. The court granted summary judgment on liability, and a jury awarded damages for past and future losses.
One driver was operating a vehicle on a public road during rainy, dark conditions. The other party was operating heavy construction equipment on the same road. The driver collided with the rear of the construction equipment. Both parties were found to be negligent, with the injured driver bearing the majority of the fault.
One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle, causing their car to flip. The injured driver claimed soft-tissue neck injuries that were complicated by a pre-existing condition. They underwent physical therapy and later saw a chiropractor, who recommended future surgery. The injured driver stated they could no longer work as a welder or perform farm activities. The defense argued the injuries had resolved and pointed to degenerative changes in the neck.
One driver was driving when the other driver hit their vehicle from behind, causing it to flip. The injured driver claimed soft-tissue neck injuries on top of a pre-existing condition. They sought future medical treatment and stated they could no longer work as a welder or do farm work. The other driver argued the injuries had resolved and pointed to a gap in treatment and pre-existing conditions. A jury awarded damages.
One driver was riding a motorcycle when the other driver changed lanes and struck them. The injured driver claimed the other driver was negligent. The collision caused orthopedic injuries to the spine, contusions, abrasions, lacerations, and sprains. The injured driver required medical treatment and may need future surgery.
One driver was making a left turn out of a parking lot when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. The case involved disputes over fault and causation of injuries, with evidence presented on medical expenses and future care needs.
One driver and her teenage passenger were rear-ended by another car while driving. The plaintiffs claimed neck and back injuries. The lawsuit alleged the driver who caused the collision was negligent. The jury found the driver liable for the accident and determined the plaintiffs' damages totaled $311,000. The case later settled for an undisclosed amount after the defense filed a notice of appeal.
One driver was accused of negligently striking the rear of another vehicle, causing it to hit the car in front. The impact resulted in neck and back injuries that required surgery. The court found the defendant negligent and awarded damages for past pain and suffering and past medical expenses.
One driver was going through an intersection with a green light when the other driver ran a red light and hit them. The injured driver had neck and back pain, headaches, and pain in their side. The court ruled in favor of the injured driver.
One driver was traveling east on a highway when their vehicle collided head-on with another vehicle traveling west. The driver traveling west had reportedly been drinking. The driver traveling east sustained multiple broken bones in their leg and foot, requiring surgery and extensive physical therapy. They experienced ongoing pain, stiffness, and limited mobility, impacting their ability to work and pursue hobbies.
One driver stopped at a traffic light and was hit from behind by a cement mixer. The driver claimed injuries to his neck, back, and knee. The case involved disputes over the severity of the injuries and the necessity of medical treatments.
One driver was attempting a left turn when they collided head-on with another driver going through the intersection. The driver making the turn was intoxicated and fled the scene but was apprehended by a bystander. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, head, knee, and wrist.
Bexar County • 2018
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.