Dallas Jury Awards $299,109 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped at a traffic light and was hit from behind by a cement mixer. The driver claimed injuries to his neck, back, and knee. The case involved disputes over the severity of the injuries and the necessity of medical treatments.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $299,109
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $299,109 is above the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On June 20, 2016, the plaintiff, a 35-year-old material handler, was driving north on Riverfront Boulevard in Dallas when his pickup truck was rear-ended by a cement mixer. The incident occurred while the plaintiff was stopped at a traffic light. The cement mixer was owned by the defendant company, Buffalo Concrete. The plaintiff alleged the defendant's driver was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout, control speed, and brake, as well as for following too closely. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded on the issue of damages.
The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and knee injuries, including strains, sprains, a disc protrusion, and radicular pain. He underwent a year of consistent physical therapy and chiropractic care, followed by various injections and radiofrequency thermocoagulation treatments. A pain management expert testified for the plaintiff, stating that the medical treatments and their costs were reasonable, necessary, and related to the collision. The plaintiff sought compensation for past and future medical expenses, as well as for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
The defense presented an orthopedic surgeon who testified that the plaintiff's injuries were limited to strains, sprains, and a mild knee contusion. The defense expert opined that several medical procedures, including MRIs and injections, were not indicated or were excessively priced. Defense counsel argued that the plaintiff's ongoing complaints were either job-related or degenerative and unrelated to the accident. A defense chiropractor also contended that the treating chiropractor's bills were excessive.
Following a four-day trial and five hours of deliberation, a Dallas jury awarded the plaintiff $299,109. The award encompassed past medical costs, future medical costs, past and future physical impairment, and past and future pain and mental anguish.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.