2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was found to be mostly at fault for a rear-end collision. The injured person experienced neck and back injuries. The jury awarded damages for past medical care and pain.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The jury found both drivers to be 50% at fault for the collision. The injured individuals sustained neck and back injuries.

One driver was involved in a collision. The case resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The first driver was found negligent. The injured person received damages for past medical care.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended them. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed neck and back injuries. The driver of the first vehicle underwent chiropractic care for soft-tissue injuries. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing and the treatment was excessive. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages.

One driver was operating a vehicle with a passenger when they were struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver filed a lawsuit alleging the other driver failed to maintain a proper lookout, avoid the collision, maintain a safe distance, and brake in time. The case involved procedural issues and a settlement was reached during mediation.

One driver was traveling east on a highway and was struck by another driver who was traveling south on a road with a stop sign. The first driver had been following a tractor-trailer that crossed the intersection and then stopped. The second driver stopped in the middle of the intersection behind the stopped truck, and the first driver collided with the second driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to her neck, back, shoulder, chest, and knee.

One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The case was tried on damages only. The jury awarded compensation for past physical pain, mental anguish, physical impairment, and medical care.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The collision resulted in injuries.

One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed to have suffered a back injury, including a herniated disc and nerve impingement. The other driver's counsel argued that the collision was not their client's fault, suggesting the injured driver may have suddenly stopped or veered into their path. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering.

One driver was approaching a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. This caused the first car to then strike the rear of a vehicle in front of it. The driver who was hit from behind claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the second driver was negligent for failing to exercise due caution.

One driver was traveling southbound when the other driver failed to control their speed and distance, causing them to rear-end the first vehicle. The first vehicle then hit the vehicle in front of it. The injured driver sought treatment for back pain.