San Antonio Jury Awards $8,811.32 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed to have suffered a back injury, including a herniated disc and nerve impingement. The other driver's counsel argued that the collision was not their client's fault, suggesting the injured driver may have suddenly stopped or veered into their path. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $8,811
- County
- Bexar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $8,811 is below the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In April 2017, a livery vehicle driver was involved in a rear-end collision in San Antonio. The plaintiff claimed his vehicle was struck by a trailing vehicle, operated by the defendant, while stopped at a red traffic signal. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant’s negligent operation of the vehicle caused the incident and resulted in a back injury, specifically a herniated lumbar disc and radiating pain.
The plaintiff asserted he initially sought chiropractic and physical therapy treatment. An orthopedic surgeon later recommended painkilling injections and ultimately suggested a lumbar discectomy and fusion. The plaintiff testified to worsening pain and a willingness to undergo surgery if affordable, claiming the injuries prevented him from playing recreational softball. He sought significant damages for past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, pain, anguish, and physical impairment.
The defendant argued the plaintiff had veered into his path and stopped suddenly, suggesting either no party was negligent or the plaintiff was solely at fault. Defense counsel challenged the extent and ongoing nature of the plaintiff's injuries, noting a lack of treatment since October 2017, the plaintiff's initial reluctance for surgery, and records from a final chiropractic visit indicating "no pain." The defense also highlighted the plaintiff’s participation in softball after the accident and contrasted the defendant’s immediate medical transport with the plaintiff’s post-incident actions.
After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for two hours and found the defendant liable for the collision. The jury awarded the plaintiff $8,811.32 in damages. This award included all past medical expenses, except those related to the orthopedic surgeon, and past lost earnings, but significantly reduced or eliminated claims for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and all categories of pain, anguish, and impairment.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Bexar County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2020, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bexar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.