One driver was traveling behind another on a road when they failed to maintain a safe distance. The rear vehicle collided with the vehicle in front, causing injuries to the occupants. The case involved claims of negligence and negligent entrustment. The parties eventually reached a settlement agreement that was approved by the court for the minor plaintiff.
One driver struck the rear of another vehicle that was stopped at an intersection. The occupants of the struck vehicle sustained contusions, bruising, emotional distress, and anxiety.
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended the vehicle behind them, pushing it into the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff claimed neck pain and a head injury. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff damages for medical bills.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle in stop-and-go traffic. The jury found the first driver 60% at fault and the second driver 40% at fault. The injured driver was awarded money for past medical care and future damages.
One driver was found negligent after a rear-end collision. The injured person received damages for past physical pain and mental anguish, past physical impairment, past lost wages, and past medical care.
One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver rear-ended her, pushing her into the vehicle in front. The injured driver claimed neck and back sprains and strains. The second driver admitted fault, stating she was distracted by road construction. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.
A three-car collision occurred where one driver rear-ended another. The jury found the defendant at fault. The injured person received compensation for past pain, impairment, and medical care.
One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle. The case was tried on damages only. The jury found the plaintiff suffered past and future physical pain, past and future mental anguish, and past physical impairment.
One driver stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries including a lumbar disc bulge, neck and shoulder sprains. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the extent of the injuries and treatment. The jury awarded damages for past medical bills.
One driver was backing out of a hotel parking lot when their van struck the front of another vehicle. The driver of the struck vehicle claimed multiple lower back injuries. Medical records indicated a lumbar strain and sprain, followed by a diagnosis of a lumbar tear, which led to surgery. The injured driver sought damages for pain, suffering, and impairment, stating the injuries interfered with daily activities. The defense argued the surgery was not caused by the accident and that prior back issues were the cause.
Dallas County • 2015
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.