Texas Jury Awards $7,700 in Grapevine Hotel Collision
One driver was backing out of a hotel parking lot when their van struck the front of another vehicle. The driver of the struck vehicle claimed multiple lower back injuries. Medical records indicated a lumbar strain and sprain, followed by a diagnosis of a lumbar tear, which led to surgery. The injured driver sought damages for pain, suffering, and impairment, stating the injuries interfered with daily activities. The defense argued the surgery was not caused by the accident and that prior back issues were the cause.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,700
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Lower Back, Laminectomy, Lumbar
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $7,700 is below the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In April 2012, a nurse was involved in a collision in a hotel parking lot in Grapevine, Texas. Her sport utility vehicle was struck by a hotel shuttle van reversing from the hotel's entrance. The plaintiff alleged the van driver, an employee of Irving Lodging L.L.C., failed to maintain a safe distance while backing up.
The plaintiff claimed multiple lower back injuries, including a lumbar strain, sprain, and eventually an L5-S1 lumbar tear, which necessitated a three-level laminectomy and internal fixation surgery. She sought damages for over $61,000 in medical bills, $8,900 in lost wages, and for ongoing pain, suffering, mental anguish, and physical impairment. Her neurosurgeon testified that the injuries and treatment were causally related to the accident. The defendant driver maintained that he had checked behind his vehicle and in his rearview mirror before reversing.
The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and their causation, arguing her surgery stemmed from pre-existing lower back issues, including a prior back surgery in 1998. The defense also presented evidence that the plaintiff had complained of back and leg pain before the accident and, in medical records, claimed to have re-injured her back by lifting her daughter shortly before her annular tear diagnosis. The plaintiff denied these claims.
Following a three-day trial and three hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant driver negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $7,700, including $5,700 for past medical costs and $2,000 for past pain and suffering and mental anguish. The reduced award, significantly less than the claimed damages, suggested the jury may have attributed only a portion of the plaintiff's claimed injuries and medical expenses to the accident, potentially influenced by the defense's arguments regarding pre-existing conditions.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.