One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver rear-ended them. A third driver then rear-ended the second driver, pushing them into the first driver. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, including disc bulges and protrusions. They sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain and suffering, and physical impairment. The defense argued that the injuries were self-limiting and that some treatments were not reasonable or necessary.
One driver stopped in traffic when another vehicle rear-ended them. A third vehicle then rear-ended the second vehicle, pushing it into the first. The police report indicated the second driver's inattention as a contributing factor. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries, including disc bulges and protrusions, and sought damages for past and future medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended their vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back discs with nerve issues. The jury found the second driver at fault and awarded damages for pain and suffering and past lost earnings.
One driver stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended her vehicle. The first driver claimed the second driver was negligent for failing to control speed, maintain a lookout, and stop for the light. The collision caused injuries to the first driver's neck and back discs, with nerve issues in her lower leg. The jury found the second driver at fault.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed various injuries, including neck and shoulder pain, and psychological trauma. The driver of the second vehicle received a ticket for failing to control speed. The case was filed in the county where the plaintiffs resided.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed various injuries, including neck and back sprains, shoulder injuries, and emotional trauma. The driver of the second vehicle received a ticket for failing to control speed. The case was filed in Victoria County, where the plaintiffs resided, and involved a claim under their own insurance policy's supplementary-uninsured-motorist provision.
One driver was traveling north and another was traveling south. The northbound driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle was involved in a collision with the southbound vehicle. The occupants of the northbound vehicle claimed they suffered injuries. The lawsuit alleged the southbound driver was negligent in the operation of their vehicle, specifically in making a left turn in front of the northbound vehicle. The police report listed failing to yield the right of way while turning left as a contributing factor for the southbound driver.
One driver attempted an unsafe left turn, colliding with another vehicle traveling in the opposite direction. The driver who turned denied fault, claiming the other driver contributed to the crash. The jury found the turning driver liable for the collision and the resulting injuries.
One driver rear-ended another driver who was stopped in traffic. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The case went to trial against the insurer on an underinsured motorist claim. The jury awarded damages for past and future medical costs, pain, and impairment.
One driver was stopped at a traffic light when the other driver collided with the rear of their vehicle. The occupants of the stopped vehicle were taken to the hospital with injuries. The case was settled before trial.
One driver collided with the rear of another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle claimed injuries, including neck and back issues, while the children experienced minor contusions and emotional distress. The jury found the driver who caused the collision negligent.
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended her vehicle. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries, including a disc bulge, and sought damages for pain, impairment, and medical expenses. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.
Bexar County • 2020
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.