Weatherford Jury Awards $55,787 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver rear-ended them. A third driver then rear-ended the second driver, pushing them into the first driver. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, including disc bulges and protrusions. They sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain and suffering, and physical impairment. The defense argued that the injuries were self-limiting and that some treatments were not reasonable or necessary.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $55,787
- County
- Parker County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $55,787 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In March 2013, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on 4th Street in Weatherford. A plaintiff, an electrician, was driving a 2006 Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck and stopping in a line of traffic when a 2011 Hyundai Elantra, driven by a first defendant, rear-ended his vehicle. Immediately afterward, a 2011 Chevrolet 1500 pickup truck, driven by a second defendant, rear-ended the first defendant's vehicle, pushing it further into the plaintiff's truck. A police report listed the second defendant's failure to control speed and inattention as contributing factors.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against both drivers, alleging they negligently failed to maintain a proper lookout and control their speed. The plaintiff claimed cervical sprains and strains, as well as disc bulges and protrusions in his lower back, requiring extensive chiropractic care and two rounds of epidural steroid injections. His medical bills totaled over $50,000, and he sought substantial damages for future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering, arguing the second defendant was 95 percent responsible for the incident. The first defendant contended that the second defendant was primarily at fault for the severe impact. The second defendant acknowledged some negligence but disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, arguing that treatment was excessive, the injuries were self-limiting, and an MRI revealed pre-existing degenerative changes.
After a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before reaching a verdict. The jury found both defendants negligent, apportioning 95 percent of the responsibility to the second defendant and 5 percent to the first defendant. The plaintiff was awarded $55,787.09 in damages. Including prejudgment interest and taxable costs, the final judgment totaled $64,197.67.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Parker County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Parker County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.