Houston Jury Finds Negligence in Left-Turn Collision, Awards $55,408
One driver was traveling north and another was traveling south. The northbound driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle was involved in a collision with the southbound vehicle. The occupants of the northbound vehicle claimed they suffered injuries. The lawsuit alleged the southbound driver was negligent in the operation of their vehicle, specifically in making a left turn in front of the northbound vehicle. The police report listed failing to yield the right of way while turning left as a contributing factor for the southbound driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $55,409
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $55,409 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On February 10, 2015, three plaintiffs, passengers in a minivan, were involved in a near head-on collision in Houston as their vehicle traveled north on Veterans Memorial Drive. The plaintiffs' minivan was proceeding through an intersection at the eastbound feeder road of North Sam Houston Parkway when it collided with a southbound minivan driven by the defendant, who was attempting a left turn. The plaintiffs claimed the defendant was negligent in her operation of the vehicle, alleging she failed to keep a proper lookout and yield the right of way by turning in front of their vehicle. The police report listed failing to yield the right of way while turning left as a contributing factor against the defendant.
The defendant argued that she stopped and ensured she had sufficient time to turn, testifying that the plaintiffs' minivan unexpectedly accelerated after she began her maneuver. Defense counsel contended this acceleration was unforeseeable. The plaintiffs denied their vehicle accelerated. Each driver maintained they had a solid green light. The plaintiffs sought damages for new injuries or aggravation of pre-existing conditions, detailing neck, back, and shoulder sprains, disc protrusions, and herniations for the adult plaintiffs, and soft tissue injuries for the minor plaintiff. They underwent chiropractic care, pain management, and received epidural steroid injections. The defense presented an expert who testified about the indications for such injections, noting some adult plaintiff records lacked such indications.
After a one-day trial and 2.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant liable. The jury awarded the adult male plaintiff $28,246.98, the adult female plaintiff $25,946.22, and the minor plaintiff $1,215.66, totaling $55,408.86 for past medical expenses and limited general damages. Post-verdict discussions with jurors indicated they considered both drivers negligent. Jurors also stated they did not award general damages to the minor plaintiff because of her testimony that she was "a trooper," and expressed concern that if medical bills were not awarded, the plaintiffs would have to pay them personally.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.