375 Georgia car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. This caused a chain reaction collision involving four vehicles. The injured driver was treated at the emergency room and released. The driver alleged soft tissue injuries to the neck, back, and shoulder, and a bulging cervical disc, requiring medical treatment.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle, causing it to hit a third vehicle. The driver of the third vehicle reported pain at the scene and sought medical attention. This driver alleged the at-fault driver was negligent and caused severe injuries and medical expenses. The at-fault driver admitted to contributing to the accident but disputed the extent of the injuries and damages. A jury found in favor of the injured driver and awarded damages.

One driver rear-ended another driver who had slowed due to traffic. The collision caused the first driver's vehicle to hit a third vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended sustained injuries and their vehicle was declared a total loss. The case was resolved before trial.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle. The driver who was hit sued, claiming the other driver was distracted and failed to maintain a safe distance. The defendant denied fault, arguing the injured driver was comparatively negligent. A jury found in favor of the plaintiff.

One driver was operating their vehicle when they collided with another vehicle. The collision caused injuries to the neck, shoulder, and back, requiring medical treatment. The case was eventually resolved, likely through a settlement agreement.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The injured person was wearing a seatbelt and sustained a fractured rib. The driver who caused the accident admitted fault, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The injured person claimed lost work time due to the injury.

One driver negligently operated his vehicle and struck another vehicle in the rear. The injured driver alleged the other driver failed to maintain his lane and failed to keep a proper lookout. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. The defendant driver raised several defenses, including claims that the complaint was barred by laches and improper service. The court denied the motion to dismiss. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.

One driver was stopped in a turn lane when the driver behind her failed to stop and rear-ended her vehicle. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit alleging the other driver was negligent. The other driver admitted to causing the incident but disputed the extent of the injuries and damages. A jury found in favor of the driver who was hit, awarding her damages for her injuries.

One driver rear-ended another driver on Lavista Road. The impact was moderate. The injured driver experienced neck and back pain and alleged that the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The other driver did not admit liability but did not seriously contest it, arguing the injured driver's condition could have been helped with consistent medical care and could have been worsened by other activities. The injured driver sought damages for pain and suffering.

One driver rear-ended another driver while stopped at an intersection. The driver who was hit claimed injuries and medical expenses. The other driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent of the injuries. The case was resolved through a settlement.

One driver stopped their vehicle on a street in Marietta, Georgia. The driver behind them collided with the rear of the stopped vehicle. The driver who was stopped alleged the other driver was not paying attention and was following too closely, causing injuries. The driver sought damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

One driver filed a lawsuit after being hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver was negligent and caused their injuries. The defendants raised several defenses. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the person who was hit.