2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver's vehicle collided with another vehicle from behind on a road in Cypress, Texas. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver failed to yield the right of way and maintain a proper lookout. The collision resulted in serious injuries to the occupants of the hit vehicle. The case went to a jury trial, which found in favor of the plaintiffs.

One driver was heading west in a construction zone when the other driver attempted to merge into her lane. The vehicles collided. The first driver later claimed multiple injuries, including headaches, neck and back sprains, and a herniated disc. The second driver contended the impact was minor and disputed causation, suggesting the first driver's multiple sclerosis might be a factor.

One driver filed a lawsuit against another driver after a car accident. The lawsuit sought damages for injuries sustained in the crash. The case went to trial, and a jury awarded the injured driver money for past medical expenses and other damages.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle, causing a multi-vehicle collision. The jury found the defendant negligent. The injured person received damages for past medical care and past physical pain.

One driver was traveling on a wet road when they slid across the center line and struck the side of another vehicle. The occupants of the second vehicle claimed multiple injuries, including chest pain, headaches, and back and neck strains. Medical records showed some injuries, but the defense questioned the severity and the necessity of certain medical charges. The jury awarded damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering.

A government vehicle was involved in an accident with a private individual. The government was found mostly liable in a previous case and paid the full damages. The government then sued the individual for their share of the liability. The court ruled in favor of the government, ordering the individual to pay their portion of the damages, plus interest and costs.

A multi-car collision occurred where one driver rear-ended another. The jury found the defendant at fault. The injured person sustained neck and back injuries, along with general bodily injuries.

One driver's vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle while stopped. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their backs and necks. One child sustained vertebral fractures requiring fusion. The case was settled.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who was rear-ended and their passengers sustained neck and back injuries. The driver who caused the collision claimed brake failure, while the vehicle owner claimed the driver was not authorized to use the vehicle. The court found the vehicle owner negligent.

A lawsuit was filed after a vehicle collision in Houston, Texas. One vehicle was struck by another vehicle, causing damage. The owner of the damaged vehicle paid for the repairs and sought reimbursement from the driver of the other vehicle. The court ruled in favor of the insurance company that paid for the repairs.

One driver was traveling north on a highway when they were involved in a three-vehicle rear-end collision. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, including herniated discs. The case involved claims of negligence against one of the other drivers, with a defense argument of comparative negligence. The jury awarded damages, but the amount was reduced due to comparative negligence.

One driver was going north and the other was going east at a broken traffic light. The driver going east broadsided the driver going north. The driver going north claimed injuries to her back and neck. The case proceeded to trial against the driver going east.