Rusk County Jury Awards $31,291 After Negligent Car Crash
One driver was traveling on a wet road when they slid across the center line and struck the side of another vehicle. The occupants of the second vehicle claimed multiple injuries, including chest pain, headaches, and back and neck strains. Medical records showed some injuries, but the defense questioned the severity and the necessity of certain medical charges. The jury awarded damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $41,375
- County
- Rusk County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Headaches, Headaches, Chiropractic
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $41,375 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On August 19, 2015, two laborers were traveling in a pickup truck in Rusk County when an oncoming car, driven by the defendant, slid across the center line on a wet curve and struck their vehicle. The plaintiffs claimed the collision caused multiple injuries and sued the defendant, alleging negligent driving, excessive speed, and failure to maintain a single lane. The defense stipulated to liability for the accident.
The plaintiffs sought damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering, reporting injuries that included chest, abdomen, neck, middle and lower back strains and sprains, headaches, and a right hand sprain. They stated their injuries impacted their ability to perform job duties and engage in hobbies. A treating emergency room doctor testified that a significant "trauma activation" charge for one plaintiff was appropriate due to reports of high impact speeds.
The defense disputed the severity of the alleged injuries and challenged the appropriateness and cost of the trauma activation. Defense counsel highlighted discrepancies between the plaintiffs' reported pain levels and medical records. An emergency medicine expert for the defense opined that trauma activation was unwarranted given the lack of severe injury indicators, such as no rollover, ejections, or loss of consciousness, and only moderate vehicle damage. A medical billing expert further testified that the trauma activation charge was excessive, suggesting a significantly lower reasonable amount.
Following a two-day trial, the jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $41,374.65. Subsequently, the court reduced the award for one plaintiff's emergency room bill to $5,074.09, aligning with the defense's expert testimony regarding a reasonable charge for the trauma activation. After this reduction, the plaintiff's total medical award was $13,849.09, resulting in a total award of $23,849.09 for that individual. The other plaintiff received $7,442.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Rusk County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Rusk County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.