Duncanville Jury Awards $41,601 in Unsafe Lane Change Crash
One driver was heading west in a construction zone when the other driver attempted to merge into her lane. The vehicles collided. The first driver later claimed multiple injuries, including headaches, neck and back sprains, and a herniated disc. The second driver contended the impact was minor and disputed causation, suggesting the first driver's multiple sclerosis might be a factor.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $41,601
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Sideswipe
- Case Type
- Headaches, Chiropractic, Herniated Disc at C6-7
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $41,601 is near the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A two-vehicle collision occurred on May 4, 2015, in Duncanville, Texas, during rush hour. A sedan, traveling west on Beltline Road, was struck by a sport utility vehicle attempting to merge into the sedan's lane near a construction zone. Police were not dispatched to the scene as both vehicles were drivable and no immediate injuries were reported. The sedan driver, an accountant, later claimed multiple injuries and filed a lawsuit against the SUV driver, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout and for an unsafe lane change. The SUV owner, the defendant's husband, was initially a party but was nonsuited before trial.
The plaintiff contended that her vehicle was stopped in traffic when the defendant merged and sideswiped it. She claimed headaches, neck and back sprains, radiating pain, a cervical intervertebral disc herniation, and anxiety about driving. The plaintiff presented medical records from chiropractic treatment, medication, and MRIs, and testified about ongoing pain and limitations impacting her daily life and work. A representative of the chiropractic clinic opined on the necessity and relation of the treatments. The defendant argued that the merge was safe and that the plaintiff abruptly pulled ahead to prevent the merge. The defense disputed causation, characterizing the event as a low-speed impact. Defense counsel also noted the plaintiff's pre-existing multiple sclerosis, low pain ratings in medical records, absence of missed work, and infrequent recent treatment. The plaintiff sought $43,101 in damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for 30 minutes. The jury found the defendant liable for the collision and awarded the plaintiff $41,601 in damages. The award covered past medical costs, past and future physical impairment, past and future physical pain, and past and future mental anguish.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.