2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was involved in a collision. The case involved injuries to the neck and back.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while driving. The driver and their children were taken to the hospital. The driver claimed neck injuries, while the children had minor injuries. The case went to trial, and the jury found the other driver liable.

One driver was operating a school bus when the other driver failed to yield at a stop sign and struck the bus. The bus driver sustained neck and back injuries. The defendant admitted to causing the accident but disputed the extent of the injuries.

One driver struck the rear of another vehicle while traveling on a highway access road. The driver who was hit suffered injuries to their spine discs. The children in the vehicle suffered sprains and strains. The driver who caused the collision argued that the other driver's actions contributed to the accident and that the injuries were pre-existing.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle on a street. The driver who was hit claimed the other driver was inattentive and failed to follow traffic laws. The case went to trial, and the jury found the at-fault driver responsible for the crash. Damages were awarded for pain, impairment, and medical expenses.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while stopped on a street. The driver who was hit sought compensation for injuries and medical expenses. The other driver claimed the injuries were pre-existing. A jury found the second driver at fault and awarded damages.

One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.

One driver was stopped to turn into a parking lot when another driver rear-ended them. The first driver claimed neck and back injuries, while the passenger claimed neck injuries. The passenger underwent surgery for disc protrusions and spinal cord contact. The second driver argued the first driver changed lanes suddenly without signaling. The jury found the first driver 80% at fault and the second driver 20% at fault.

One driver was operating their vehicle on a freeway when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who was struck sustained injuries including a fractured radius and ulna, a fractured tibia and fibula, and back muscle spasms. The jury found the striking driver negligent.

One driver was traveling on a highway when another vehicle struck the rear of her car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her neck, shoulder, and breast, including a ruptured breast implant. The other driver argued the impact was minor and the implant rupture was due to its age. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.

One driver was heading south and the other was heading north. The driver heading north attempted to turn left, and the driver heading south attempted to turn right. The two vehicles collided. The driver heading north was found to be more at fault for failing to yield the right of way. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries.

One driver was stopped on the road when another driver rear-ended them. The occupants of the stopped vehicle claimed multiple injuries, including herniated discs in their necks and back pain. The defense questioned the cause and timing of the injuries, suggesting potential collusion between the plaintiffs and their attorney. The case proceeded to a jury trial focused on damages.