Fort Worth, Texas Jury Awards $57,509 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was traveling on a highway when another vehicle struck the rear of her car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her neck, shoulder, and breast, including a ruptured breast implant. The other driver argued the impact was minor and the implant rupture was due to its age. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $57,509
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $57,509 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On February 10, 2016, a vehicle driven by the defendant struck the rear driver's side of the plaintiff's vehicle in Fort Worth, Texas. The plaintiff, an information-technology worker, claimed injuries to her neck, left shoulder, and left breast. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligent operation of a vehicle. The defendant denied negligence, asserting the plaintiff made a sudden stop.
The court later granted a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability, and the trial proceeded solely on causation and damages. The plaintiff presented evidence that she sought emergency medical care hours after the collision and later underwent surgery in September 2016 to remove a ruptured left breast implant, replace both implants, and perform a breast lift. She also received five months of chiropractic care for her neck and shoulder. Treating medical experts opined that the collision caused the ruptured implant, citing a shoulder-harness injury, and was responsible for the neck and shoulder complaints. The plaintiff testified to missing two weeks of work and claimed disfigurement, seeking damages for medical costs, pain and suffering, physical impairment, and lost earnings.
The defense argued that the plaintiff sustained only minor sprains and strains from the accident. They contended that the impact was too minor to rupture a 14-year-old saline implant, suggesting the rupture was likely due to the implant's age, which was nearing the end of its average lifespan. The defense also highlighted the absence of initial medical records documenting a breast implant complaint and argued that the plaintiff’s decision to replace both implants with a newer type constituted an elective cosmetic upgrade. After a two-day trial and three hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $57,509 in damages.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. The injured driver claimed to have suffered back and neck injuries, and that the accident aggravated pre-existing conditions. The jury found the driver who caused the collision liable and awarded damages, but the plaintiff received nothing due to prior insurance settlements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck. The driver who caused the collision stated her foot slipped off the brake pedal. The jury found that the collision was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.