One driver crashed into the rear of another vehicle on a highway. The impact caused the driver in front to suffer injuries requiring medical treatment. The injured driver sued, alleging the other driver failed to maintain proper speed and lookout. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.
One driver crashed into the rear of another vehicle on a highway. The driver who was hit sustained injuries requiring medical treatment. The injured driver sued the other driver, alleging negligence. The jury found in favor of the injured driver and awarded damages.
One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The case focused solely on determining the damages. The jury awarded money for past medical care but no compensation for pain, suffering, or loss of earning capacity.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The jury found the defendant at fault for the collision. The injured person sought damages for past medical care.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The jury found the defendant driver at fault for the collision. The injured person was awarded damages for past medical care.
One driver allegedly failed to operate their vehicle safely, leading to a collision. The injured person incurred medical expenses and suffered personal injuries. The parties reached a settlement agreement that required court approval for the minor's claims. The court approved the settlement, and funds were disbursed to lien holders, attorneys, and a trust account for the minor.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed this incident, and a second similar incident, caused neck injuries. The drivers who admitted to striking the plaintiff's vehicle denied that these collisions were the cause of the claimed injuries. A jury awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver stopped at a stop sign and was rear-ended by the other driver. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries including headaches, disc protrusions in her neck and lower back, and shoulder pain. She underwent physical therapy and MRIs. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the credibility of the chiropractor and the necessity of the treatment. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages.
One driver was merging onto a freeway when they collided with a truck. The driver's vehicle then spun and struck another vehicle. The injured driver claimed neck and shoulder injuries and sought damages for pain and suffering.
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by another vehicle. Later, the same driver stopped at another red light and was again rear-ended by a different vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries from both accidents, including shoulder bursitis and herniated discs, which he argued were aggravations of pre-existing conditions. The defense argued that the impacts were minor and the injuries were pre-existing.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.