One driver ran a red light and hit another vehicle carrying a driver and two passengers. The driver who ran the red light was operating a tractor-trailer. The driver of the other vehicle sustained a serious disc injury requiring surgery. One passenger had a knee injury and concussion, and the other passenger had neck and back injuries and a concussion. The parties settled the initial claims. The driver then pursued underinsured motorist benefits from his own insurance company.
A motorcyclist was riding on a street when a car turned in front of him, causing a collision. The motorcyclist sustained injuries to his legs and wrist, along with road rash. The driver of the car was a minor who did not have a license and was driving a vehicle from his father's used-car lot. The lawsuit alleged negligence in the operation of the vehicle and negligent entrustment. The defense argued the motorcyclist was speeding and driving recklessly.
A four-car rear-end collision occurred in traffic. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was using a cell phone. The case focused on determining the damages.
One driver's vehicle was struck from behind by a taxi. The driver and passenger claimed injuries to their spine. The court granted summary judgment on liability for the plaintiffs. The defendants did not appear for trial. The court awarded damages to both plaintiffs.
One driver was traveling on a road when their vehicle was struck from behind by another driver. The driver who was hit suffered injuries to their spine, including disc issues. The driver who caused the collision was found to be negligent. The case resulted in a verdict for the injured parties.
One driver was traveling north on a rural road when he collided head-on with another driver going south. The northbound driver sustained multiple injuries, including fractures and herniated discs. He sued the other driver, alleging negligence for failing to keep a proper lookout and crossing the center line. The defense argued the collision occurred in the southbound lane. The injured driver sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
One driver was a passenger in a vehicle that was waved through an intersection under construction. The vehicle was struck by another vehicle traveling straight. The collision caused injuries to the passenger, including back and knee injuries. The jury found multiple parties negligent for the crash.
One driver was exiting a private driveway and turned left into the path of another vehicle. The driver who exited the driveway did not check for approaching traffic. The collision caused the injured driver to lose consciousness. The injured driver was diagnosed with a concussion and later a traumatic brain injury, experiencing headaches and cognitive issues.
One driver was helping another move items when a repo driver arrived. The second driver got into his truck and reversed at a high speed, running over the first driver's foot and ankle. The injured driver suffered a fractured tibia and fibula, requiring surgery and causing ongoing pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck by another vehicle. The striking vehicle had disregarded a red light and collided with a vehicle that was then pushed into the plaintiffs vehicle. The injured driver suffered injuries to their lumbar and cervical spine, including sprains and strains, and a wrist sprain.
One driver was heading east and stopped at an intersection. Another driver was heading south, entered the intersection, struck a westbound vehicle, and then struck the plaintiffs' car and another vehicle. The impact pushed the plaintiffs' car into the other vehicle. The police report indicated the southbound driver ran a red light. The driver who ran the red light claimed his light was yellow. The injured driver claimed a lower back injury, including aggravation of a pre-existing condition, a herniated disc, and neck and back sprains. He also claimed lacerations and headaches from being thrown into his rear-view mirror. His son claimed leg pain that resolved without treatment. The injured driver underwent treatment for his back, including injections, and was recommended surgery. He testified he can no longer sit or stand for long periods and cannot participate in certain activities. The defense argued the lower back problems were pre-existing and questioned the plaintiff's testimony about prior treatments.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
