One driver stopped in traffic when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who was hit alleged injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages for past pain and suffering, past medical expenses, and past lost wages.
One party initiated legal action against two others regarding a contract for a motor vehicle purchase. The plaintiff claimed the defendants failed to meet their obligations under the contract. The defendants raised several defenses, including statute of limitations and improper handling of collateral. After a bench trial, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages, court costs, and attorney's fees.
One driver was traveling west on a road in Dallas when the other driver, traveling north, allegedly ran a red light and struck the driver's side of the first vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, and right knee. The second driver claimed the first driver was comparatively negligent. The injured driver sought damages for past and future medical expenses.
One driver was involved in a collision with another vehicle in Harris County, Texas. The occupants of the second vehicle filed a lawsuit alleging the first driver's negligence caused the crash. They sought damages for medical expenses and pain. The defense raised several arguments, including proportionate responsibility and contributory negligence. The jury found the first driver negligent and awarded damages for past medical expenses to the plaintiffs.
One driver was backing out of an alley when they struck the side of another vehicle. The driver who backed out was cited by police for unsafe backing. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries, including strains, sprains, and a lumbar disc bulge. They underwent chiropractic treatment, physical therapy, and diagnostic imaging. The case went to trial, and the jury found the backing driver negligent.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver failed to stop and struck the first vehicle from behind. The first driver alleged the second driver was negligent for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and brake. The second driver claimed a third vehicle caused the collision. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver hit their vehicle from behind. The injured driver sought medical treatment for neck, back, and hip pain. The jury found the second driver solely at fault and awarded damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering.
One driver was found negligent after a rear-end collision. The crash resulted in neck and back injuries for one person. The jury awarded damages for past physical pain, past mental anguish, and past medical care.
One driver stopped at a red light when another driver slid on ice and rear-ended her, pushing her vehicle into the plaintiffs'. The first driver was later rear-ended by a hit-and-run driver. The plaintiffs claimed multiple injuries from both accidents.
A collision occurred when a cow entered the roadway and struck a vehicle. The vehicle's occupants sued the animal's owners, alleging negligence in failing to secure their livestock. The court entered a default judgment against one owner and awarded damages. The other owner was dismissed from the case.
One company filed a lawsuit against an individual for defaulting on a vehicle purchase contract. The individual failed to make payments and did not return the vehicle. The company sought to recover the vehicle and the outstanding debt, plus interest and attorney fees. After multiple attempts to serve the individual, the court allowed substituted service. The court eventually entered a default judgment in favor of the company, awarding them possession of the vehicle, monetary damages, interest, and attorney fees.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, pushing it into the car in front. The driver of the middle car claimed back and neck injuries. The case went to trial against the uninsured/underinsured carrier.
Harris County • 2018
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.