One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The jury found the first driver at fault and the second driver not at fault. The injured driver was awarded damages for past physical pain, past physical impairment, and past medical care.
Real settlement and verdict data from Texas. Broken down by injury type, county, and outcome—so you know what to expect.
Select your injury type to see what similar Texas cases resolved for.
How Texas case outcomes differ depending on injury severity.
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
$30,000
Median from 278 cases
$16,362
Median from 2,132 cases
Browse all Texas car accident settlements and verdicts. Filter by injury or accident type.
Showing 1189–1200 of 1,786+ cases
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The jury found the first driver at fault and the second driver not at fault. The injured driver was awarded damages for past physical pain, past physical impairment, and past medical care.
One driver was traveling on an interstate highway when they rear-ended another vehicle. The driver who initiated the collision claimed injuries to their back and neck, including sprains, strains, and disc issues. They sought damages for medical expenses, pain, and suffering. The other driver did not attend the trial, and liability was not strongly contested. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff damages.
One driver was found negligent for a motor vehicle accident. The other driver was not found negligent. The jury awarded damages for past and future physical pain and mental anguish, past and future physical impairment, and past medical care.
One driver was making a left turn at an intersection when they collided with another vehicle. The driver making the turn claimed injuries to their neck, back, shoulder, chest, and knees. The other driver argued their actions were not negligent and questioned the severity of the injuries. The jury found the driver who made the turn negligent.
Two people were injured when their stopped vehicle was hit from behind. They claimed the other driver was negligent for not stopping in time. The other driver argued the accident was unavoidable. The case involved claims for neck and back injuries and property damage.
One driver was traveling on Mockingbird Lane and collided with another driver on Auberdale Avenue in Highland Park. The collision occurred in the intersection. There were no bodily injuries claimed, but there was damage to one of the vehicles. The court determined one driver was liable for the collision and awarded damages for the vehicle's repair.
One driver was traveling on a main road when another driver failed to stop at a stop sign and entered the intersection. The two vehicles collided. The first vehicle then left the roadway, went through a fence, and struck a house. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their necks and backs. The occupants of the house also claimed injuries.
One driver filed a lawsuit against another driver and a vehicle owner after a collision. The injured driver alleged the other driver rear-ended their vehicle due to a failure to control speed and maintain a proper lookout. The injured driver claimed personal injuries and sought damages. The defendants denied negligence and asserted multiple defenses, including contributory negligence and prior injuries. The case went to trial, and the jury found in favor of the injured driver, awarding damages.
One driver was stopped on the highway due to an accident ahead when another driver rear-ended her. The stopped driver claimed injuries to her neck, upper back, and shoulder. The other driver argued that the stopped driver braked suddenly. The jury found the second driver negligent.
One driver stopped because of an accident ahead. The other driver, who was following too closely, rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her neck, upper back, and shoulder. The defense argued the stopping was sudden and that the injuries were not caused by this accident.
One driver was found negligent in a motor vehicle accident. The jury awarded damages for past physical pain and mental anguish, and past medical care. Gross negligence was also found, leading to exemplary damages.
One driver stopped at a traffic light and was hit from behind by the other driver. The driver who was hit from behind alleged serious injuries to their neck and back. The other driver denied negligence and injury. The jury found the second driver negligent.
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Firms that have handled the most Texas car accident cases in our data.
91 cases in Texas
Median settlement
$11,516
28 cases in Texas
Median settlement
$78,940
26 cases in Texas
Median settlement
$25,325
26 cases in Texas
Median settlement
$17,507
22 cases in Texas
Median settlement
$12,243
Answer a few quick questions and we'll compare your situation against real Texas case outcomes.
Get Your Free EstimateKey legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
2 years from the date of the accident
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.