Houston Jury Awards $17,934 in Motor Vehicle Collision
One driver was traveling on a main road when another driver failed to stop at a stop sign and entered the intersection. The two vehicles collided. The first vehicle then left the roadway, went through a fence, and struck a house. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their necks and backs. The occupants of the house also claimed injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $17,834
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $17,834 is below the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On March 17, 2016, a collision occurred in Houston, Texas, between a pickup truck and a sport utility vehicle. The driver plaintiff was operating the pickup with a passenger plaintiff in the southbound lane of Irvington Boulevard when the defendant driver, a 17-year-old without a license, crossed from Apache Street into their path. Following the initial impact, the pickup accelerated to the right, crashed through a fence, and struck a house, injuring some occupants inside.
The plaintiffs filed lawsuits, later consolidated, alleging the defendant driver was negligent in operating the vehicle. They further claimed the defendant father was negligent for entrusting the vehicle to his unlicensed daughter. The driver plaintiff sought damages for neck and back injuries, requesting over $31,000. The passenger plaintiff, who alleged a herniated disc among other injuries, sought over $76,000 for medical expenses, pain, and impairment.
A court granted the plaintiffs a directed verdict on the defendant driver's negligence. However, the defense contested the negligent entrustment claim, arguing the defendant father was out of town, had left keys on a dresser, and his daughter had not previously taken the vehicle. The defense also asserted the plaintiff driver accidentally hit the accelerator after the initial impact, leading to the collision with the house. During trial, the defense emphasized plaintiffs' perceived inconsistencies, particularly regarding their prior acquaintance and referral to a chiropractor, and suggested lower awards for damages.
After a two-day trial, the jury did not find the defendant father negligent but found the defendant driver liable. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $17,934. Defense counsel indicated that the plaintiffs' frequent contradictions and impeachments during testimony likely influenced the jury's decision, particularly the finding against the father and the lower monetary award compared to the requested damages.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.