One driver stopped in traffic and was hit from behind by another driver. The impact pushed the first car into the vehicle in front. The passenger in the first car had a pre-existing hip injury that was aggravated by the collision. The passenger claimed increased pain and limitations, requiring a cane. The other driver argued the impact was minor and the passenger did not seek further treatment.
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver hit them from behind. The first driver claimed serious neck injuries. The second driver admitted fault but argued the injuries were not related to the crash. A jury found the second driver's actions caused harm and awarded damages.
A 16-year-old driver with a learner's permit was rear-ended by an ambulance, which had been rear-ended by another vehicle. The collision caused a chain reaction. The driver reported injuries to her back and neck, requiring months of chiropractic treatment. She stated the injuries impacted her ability to dance. The defense argued the collision was minor and the injuries were pre-existing or from other activities. The jury found fault with both the ambulance driver and the driver of the first vehicle. The injured driver was awarded damages for pain and impairment.
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by a commercial truck. The truck then pushed the stopped vehicle into the vehicle in front of it. The occupants of the two stopped vehicles claimed neck and back injuries, including herniated discs. They underwent physical therapy and received injections. The jury found the truck driver negligent.
One driver stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The injured driver experienced neck and back pain, headaches, and anxiety. Medical treatment included injections. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages for past and future pain and suffering, past medical expenses, and past lost wages.
One driver was stopped in heavy traffic when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed injuries to their lower back. The injured driver was diagnosed with disc herniations and radiculopathy, requiring physical therapy and pain management. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing.
Two passengers were injured when the pickup truck they were riding in was rear-ended by a pizza delivery car. The driver of the pickup truck was stopped at a stop sign, preparing to turn. The driver of the car failed to stop and collided with the back of the pickup truck. One passenger suffered a torn shoulder labrum and a cervical injury, requiring surgery and physical therapy. The other passenger sustained a compression fracture of two vertebrae. Both claimed permanent pain and impairment.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, elbow, and neck. The at-fault driver stated they were coming to a stop and thought the other vehicle was going to proceed. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses, pain, and impairment, while the defense argued the injuries were due to pre-existing conditions and subsequent medical events.
One driver was slowing down in traffic when the other driver failed to control their speed and hit the back of their vehicle. The injured driver sought damages for medical care, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other related expenses. A jury found the second driver liable and awarded damages.
One driver was turning when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case went to trial, and the jury found the driver who caused the collision fully liable for the damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended her. The driver who was hit claimed injuries including neck pain, headaches, back pain, and a torn rotator cuff. The other driver argued that the injured driver braked too suddenly. The jury found both drivers partially at fault.
Montgomery County • 2017
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.