Victoria Jury Awards $160,000 in Negligent Rear-End Collision
One driver was turning when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case went to trial, and the jury found the driver who caused the collision fully liable for the damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $160,000
- County
- Victoria County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $160,000 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A driver sustained back and neck injuries following a rear-end collision in Victoria on September 28, 2019. The plaintiff's vehicle was struck from behind by a sport utility vehicle, driven by the defendant, while executing a right turn. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligent operation of a vehicle. A judge directed a verdict, finding the defendant fully liable for the collision.
The case then proceeded to a trial on damages. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered sprains and strains in the cervical and lumbar regions, along with spinal-joint dysfunction, after the incident. Treatment initially involved a hospital visit, followed by chiropractic care for several months, with a later brief resumption of treatment. A chiropractic expert testified that the plaintiff could expect further pain requiring future surgery and injections. The plaintiff sought to recover $244,000 for past and future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, physical pain and mental anguish, and physical impairment.
The defense contended that the accident was a minor collision incapable of causing the claimed injuries. The defense highlighted that the plaintiff's initial complaints and diagnoses were limited to the neck until chiropractic treatment began, and that the plaintiff did not pursue an evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon. The defense also pointed to a gap in treatment and argued the plaintiff was exaggerating the complaints, suggesting an award of $18,000 if damages were to be granted.
After a two-day trial, a jury deliberated for three hours before returning a verdict. The jury determined the plaintiff's total damages to be $160,000. This award included compensation for past medical costs, future medical costs, past physical impairment, future physical impairment, past physical pain and mental anguish, future physical pain and mental anguish, and past loss of earning capacity.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Victoria County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2021, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Victoria County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.