68 Arizona car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One person loaned another person money to build an aircraft hangar. The hangar later caught fire and destroyed the aircraft. The lender sued the borrower for the loan money and the value of the aircraft. The parties settled the contract dispute, with the borrower agreeing to pay a portion of the loan. The court later ruled on other claims, finding no bailment or negligence on the borrower's part. The borrower was awarded costs and expert witness fees.

One driver's car top carrier was installed negligently, leading to an accident. The incident aggravated a pre-existing medical condition.

A passenger in one car was killed when the driver turned in front of a speeding truck. The driver was found to have failed to yield the right of way.

One driver was crossing a highway when they were struck by a truck that was rounding a corner. The defense argued that the driver had enough time to stop.

One driver and another driver were involved in a car crash. The first driver claimed the second driver's actions caused injuries to a previous back surgery, carpal tunnel syndrome, and soft tissue damage. The second driver admitted fault but argued the injuries were pre-existing and only minor. The first driver sought $88,000 in damages.

One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The other driver claimed the collision caused soft tissue injuries and ongoing pain. Experts disagreed on whether the pain was a result of the accident.

One driver was involved in a work-related car accident. The other driver's insurance paid their policy limit. The injured driver then sought underinsured motorist benefits from their own insurance company. After a dispute over the amount owed, the case went to arbitration, which determined the injured driver's damages were higher than the policy limit. The insurance company paid the policy limit, but a subsequent bad faith claim was denied.

One driver and two passengers were involved in a motor vehicle collision. The driver sustained injuries resulting in medical expenses. The driver sought compensation from the at-fault motorist and later filed a claim with their own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits. The insurance company denied the claim, stating the driver had rejected this coverage. The case went to court, and after an appeal, the parties settled.

One driver brought an action against another motorist after a collision. The driver then filed a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the collision caused depression and that their damages exceeded the other driver's limits. The insurance company refused to pay, and the driver alleged breach of contract and bad faith for failure to conduct an adequate investigation. The defense argued that the depression was not related to the accident or was exaggerated.

One driver collided with a person riding a bicycle while turning. The driver failed to use signals, which was a motor vehicle violation. The bicyclist sustained sprains.

One driver was involved in a three-vehicle collision when the vehicles behind her struck her car. The driver sustained injuries in the crash. A jury found one driver entirely at fault and awarded the injured driver $20,000.

A parking lot accident occurred. The injured person experienced thoracic and lumbar strain and sprain. The plaintiff was found to be 20% at fault.