One person alleged that a bicycle shop failed to adequately repair their bike. They claimed that due to the faulty repairs, the bike malfunctioned while they were riding it, causing them to sustain personal injuries. A jury found in favor of the injured person.
One driver's insurance company delayed payment for medical treatment after an accident. This delay caused emotional distress and postponed necessary medical care for the injured person.
One driver was involved in a collision with another vehicle. Following the collision, the injured person was diagnosed with bursitis that required surgery. Later, the injured person developed a condition requiring cervical fusion surgery. The injured person claimed the cervical surgeries were related to the accident, while the other party admitted liability for the initial treatment but disputed the necessity of the later surgeries.
An elderly man with a severe brain injury was admitted to a residency facility. The facility was aware of prior incidents where he ingested foreign objects, but allegedly failed to implement safety precautions. Shortly after a change in ownership and staff, the man began vomiting and died. An autopsy revealed foreign objects in his stomach and intestines, which were determined to be significant contributing factors to his death.
One driver was on a motorcycle when the other driver made a turn in front of them. The motorcycle rider was hit by the truck. The rider had a harrington rod implant.
One driver was operating a pickup truck on an interstate when he was rear-ended by a tractor-trailer. The collision caused the pickup truck to be a total loss. The driver sued the tractor-trailer operator and their employer, claiming negligence. The case focused on whether the loss of use of the pickup truck, which was used for a hunting guide business, was compensable.
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver, operating a truck towing a trailer, struck her vehicle. The collision occurred as the second driver approached the intersection and was unable to stop in time. The injured driver suffered fatal injuries. The defendants admitted fault but disputed the extent of damages.
One driver lost control of their vehicle on a wet road and hydroplaned. The vehicle was then struck from behind by a large oil truck. The case involved a wrongful death claim.
One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle in Tucson, Arizona. The injured driver suffered multiple injuries. The at-fault driver's insurance settled for policy limits. The injured driver's own underinsured motorist coverage claim was denied, leading to a lawsuit. A jury found in favor of the injured driver, awarding damages.
One driver collided with another car, causing serious injuries. The injured person requested damages from the at-fault driver's insurance company. The case was settled for the policy limit.
One driver lost control of their vehicle in a single-car accident. The passenger in the vehicle sustained an elbow and shoulder injury, resulting in a 13 percent whole-body impairment.
Maricopa County • 2020
Geography
Where Arizona Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Arizona.
Key legal rules that affect how Arizona car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Pure Comparative Fault
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage
Arizona follows pure comparative fault, allowing you to recover damages even if you were mostly at fault—your award is reduced by your percentage of responsibility.
The state does not cap compensatory damages for personal injury cases.
Arizona does not have a no-fault insurance system, meaning the at-fault driver’s insurance is responsible for damages.
FAQ
Arizona Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Arizona case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Arizona attorney for guidance specific to your situation.