Verdictly
Settlement
Yuma County • 2017

Arbitrator Awards $50,000 in Underinsured Motorist Claim

One driver was involved in a work-related car accident. The other driver's insurance paid their policy limit. The injured driver then sought underinsured motorist benefits from their own insurance company. After a dispute over the amount owed, the case went to arbitration, which determined the injured driver's damages were higher than the policy limit. The insurance company paid the policy limit, but a subsequent bad faith claim was denied.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Other Accident

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$50,000
County
Yuma County, AZ
Resolved
2017

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Other
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Accident

Settlement Context

This settlement of $50,000 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In May 2007, a plaintiff was involved in a work-related automobile accident. The plaintiff held an underinsured motorist (UIM) policy with an insurer, carrying a $50,000 limit. After the other driver's insurer paid its $15,000 liability limit, the plaintiff claimed higher damages and sought the full UIM policy limit from their own insurer. The insurer initially offered $2,500 to settle the claim.

As the plaintiff's claimed damages, including medical bills and lost wages, escalated to $117,922.10, the insurer's offer increased to $3,500. The plaintiff then filed a complaint for breach of contract, alleging failure to pay UIM benefits. After a Social Security Administration determination of total disability, the plaintiff demanded the $50,000 policy limit. The parties proceeded to binding arbitration, where an arbitrator found the plaintiff's accident-related damages, including fibromyalgia, totaled $200,000.

Following the arbitration award, the insurer paid the plaintiff the $50,000 UIM policy limit. The plaintiff's subsequent attempt to add a bad faith claim was denied by the trial court, which cited prejudicial and dilatory delay. The court then dismissed the entire case with prejudice.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Yuma County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

45
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Yuma County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case