Arbitrator Awards $50,000 in Underinsured Motorist Claim
One driver was involved in a work-related car accident. The other driver's insurance paid their policy limit. The injured driver then sought underinsured motorist benefits from their own insurance company. After a dispute over the amount owed, the case went to arbitration, which determined the injured driver's damages were higher than the policy limit. The insurance company paid the policy limit, but a subsequent bad faith claim was denied.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $50,000
- County
- Yuma County, AZ
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Settlement Context
This settlement of $50,000 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In May 2007, a plaintiff was involved in a work-related automobile accident. The plaintiff held an underinsured motorist (UIM) policy with an insurer, carrying a $50,000 limit. After the other driver's insurer paid its $15,000 liability limit, the plaintiff claimed higher damages and sought the full UIM policy limit from their own insurer. The insurer initially offered $2,500 to settle the claim.
As the plaintiff's claimed damages, including medical bills and lost wages, escalated to $117,922.10, the insurer's offer increased to $3,500. The plaintiff then filed a complaint for breach of contract, alleging failure to pay UIM benefits. After a Social Security Administration determination of total disability, the plaintiff demanded the $50,000 policy limit. The parties proceeded to binding arbitration, where an arbitrator found the plaintiff's accident-related damages, including fibromyalgia, totaled $200,000.
Following the arbitration award, the insurer paid the plaintiff the $50,000 UIM policy limit. The plaintiff's subsequent attempt to add a bad faith claim was denied by the trial court, which cited prejudicial and dilatory delay. The court then dismissed the entire case with prejudice.
Understanding This Case
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Yuma County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Yuma County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.