One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle sustained injuries. The case went to trial.
Real settlement and verdict data from Arizona. Broken down by injury type, county, and outcome—so you know what to expect.
Select your injury type to see what similar Arizona cases resolved for.
How Arizona case outcomes differ depending on injury severity.
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
Median outcome
$275,000
Median from 18 cases
$188,450
Median from 50 cases
Browse all Arizona car accident settlements and verdicts. Filter by injury or accident type.
Showing 49–60 of 68+ cases
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle sustained injuries. The case went to trial.
One driver was injured in an auto accident and later received medical treatment. The driver believed their health insurance would cover the costs. However, a company that purchased the medical provider's receivables sought payment from the driver. The driver filed a complaint to clarify who should pay for the medical services. The court ruled in favor of the driver, stating the company could not bill them directly.
A collision occurred in Chandler, Arizona, between an installation truck and a van. The owner of the truck claimed the other driver caused $15,000 in property damage to their vehicle. The owner sued to recover the costs after the other party refused to pay.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The injured person sustained ulnar nerve injuries and a concussion. The case resulted in a jury verdict for the plaintiff.
One driver claimed a collision caused soft tissue injuries and headaches. The other driver argued a hit-and-run driver caused the initial impact, and that the injured person's condition was unrelated to the accident.
One driver made a negligent left turn into the path of another vehicle, causing a collision. The injured driver sustained soft tissue injuries to their neck, back, and chest, along with cuts and bruises. Medical expenses were claimed.
One driver admitted fault for a collision that damaged another person's vehicle. The damaged vehicle was repaired, but the owner believed it lost value. An expert estimated this diminished value. The owner filed a complaint seeking compensation for this loss. The court denied a motion for summary judgment, and the case proceeded to arbitration.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The case resulted in an award of $9,472.
One driver sued another driver after a motor vehicle accident, claiming injuries. The case went through arbitration and then a jury trial. The jury found in favor of the injured driver and awarded damages. The judge also awarded attorney's fees and sanctions.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The injured person sustained a back injury. The case resulted in a plaintiff verdict.
One driver was injured in a car accident. The other driver admitted fault. The injured driver sought compensation for her injuries, claiming her medical damages were higher than the insurance policy limit. Her own insurance company covered some medical costs but disputed others, citing pre-existing injuries. The dispute went to arbitration, which awarded the injured driver $7,500. She then filed a complaint to challenge the arbitration decision, but the court denied her request.
One driver was operating an oversize vehicle and collided with a motorcycle. The motorcycle operator sustained fatal injuries. The court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants and awarded them costs.
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Arizona.
Firms that have handled the most Arizona car accident cases in our data.
Answer a few quick questions and we'll compare your situation against real Arizona case outcomes.
Get Your Free EstimateKey legal rules that affect how Arizona car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Pure Comparative Fault
2 years from the date of the accident
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage
Arizona follows pure comparative fault, allowing you to recover damages even if you were mostly at fault—your award is reduced by your percentage of responsibility.
The state does not cap compensatory damages for personal injury cases.
Arizona does not have a no-fault insurance system, meaning the at-fault driver’s insurance is responsible for damages.
Answers based on real Arizona case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Arizona attorney for guidance specific to your situation.