Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Pima County • 2012

Pima County Jury Awards Over $400K in Bad Faith Claim

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle in Tucson, Arizona. The injured driver suffered multiple injuries. The at-fault driver's insurance settled for policy limits. The injured driver's own underinsured motorist coverage claim was denied, leading to a lawsuit. A jury found in favor of the injured driver, awarding damages.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Economic Injury

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$287,000
County
Pima County, AZ
Resolved
2012

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Economic Injury

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $287,000 is above the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In September 2005, a plaintiff driving in Tucson, Arizona, was involved in a rear-end collision and sustained multiple injuries. The driver of the other vehicle, insured by USAA, settled with the plaintiff for the policy limits of $20,000. The plaintiff then sought underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from her own insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, under a policy providing $500,000 in UIM coverage. State Farm denied the claim, asserting the plaintiff had been adequately compensated.

In June 2010, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against State Farm in the Arizona Superior Court for Pima County, alleging breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiff sought various damages, including general, special, and punitive damages.

The case proceeded to trial, and in September 2012, a jury found in favor of the plaintiff, determining her full damages to be $287,000. In November 2012, the court entered judgment for $287,000 against State Farm, reduced by the $20,000 previously recovered from the other driver's insurer. The court also determined that State Farm had failed to accept an earlier offer of judgment of $50,000 from the plaintiff. As a result, State Farm was ordered to pay doubled taxable costs, expert witness fees, prejudgment interest, and attorneys' fees, in addition to jury fees. The total judgment, including these additional awards, amounted to over $400,000.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Pima County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2012, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

38
/100
Potentially Unfair

This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to understand your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Pima County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.