2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle incident. The case resulted in a settlement.

One driver was proceeding on a highway when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The first driver claimed to have suffered a significant injury to their lower back, specifically a displaced disc. The second driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the severity of the injuries. A jury determined that the first driver was injured due to the second driver's negligence and awarded damages.

One driver was involved in a collision with another vehicle. The case resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

One driver ran a red light and struck another vehicle on its side. The injured driver claimed head and knee injuries, which later developed into headaches, dizziness, and back pain. The injured driver also experienced difficulty exercising and performing household tasks. The jury awarded damages for medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and pain and suffering.

A young boy was injured while riding an all-terrain vehicle at his grandparents' ranch. He crashed into a utility pole and sustained a fracture to his left arm. His father sued the boy's mother and grandparents, alleging negligence and failure to supervise. The defense argued the Recreational Use Statute applied and that the injury was not severe. The case settled for $20,000.

One driver was traveling on a highway when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who caused the collision fled the scene and was later found to be intoxicated. The injured driver alleged the collision caused a disc displacement and neck pain. The jury determined the collision caused harm and awarded damages.

One driver ran a red light and struck another vehicle head-on. The occupants of the struck vehicle were injured and taken to the hospital. The minor passenger was diagnosed with knee and shoulder contusions, and neck and back sprains. The case was settled.

One driver was injured when their vehicle was struck by a car that ran a red light. The driver who ran the red light was employed by the defendant city. The defense argued that a third party caused a sudden emergency. The jury found the defendant negligent.

A driver was going through an intersection in Houston when another driver ran a red light and hit his car. The driver sued the city for the officer's actions. The city admitted fault. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder sprains and strains. He received medical treatment and sought compensation for his injuries and pain.

One driver was test-driving a sport utility vehicle with a passenger when they stopped in a U-turn lane. The other driver rear-ended them. The occupants claimed injuries to their backs, necks, shoulders, and elbows. The driver of the other vehicle did not attend trial, but his deposition was read. He testified that the plaintiffs were moving forward and he thought they were entering a feeder road, so he looked for traffic and started moving forward, estimating he was going about 1 mph at impact. The defense did not strongly dispute that the driver's negligence caused the accident but denied negligent entrustment by the vehicle owner.

One driver was heading south and stopped at an intersection to turn left. The other driver was approaching from the opposite direction. The vehicles collided in the intersection. The first driver claimed neck and back injuries, alleging the other driver failed to keep a proper lookout and crossed the center line. The second driver's counsel argued the first driver attempted an unsafe left turn and failed to yield the right of way.

One driver stopped suddenly on a road, and the driver behind him rear-ended him. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries, including head, neck, and back issues. Medical evaluations showed some soft tissue injuries and disc bulges, but also noted normal neurological exams and scans. The injured driver sought compensation for past medical bills and pain and suffering. The other driver argued the impact was minor and the injured driver was not visibly harmed.