One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver failed to control speed and rear-ended her vehicle. The injured driver sued, alleging the other driver was negligent. The other driver claimed the injured driver failed to mitigate damages, the injuries were from a pre-existing condition, and it was an unavoidable accident. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.
One driver was traveling southbound and the other was traveling northbound. The northbound driver attempted to turn left and collided with the southbound driver's vehicle. The southbound driver claimed the northbound driver was negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and brake in time. They also alleged the northbound driver negligently allowed an unlicensed driver to operate their vehicle.
One driver failed to control their speed and distance, causing a rear-end collision with another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle sued, alleging negligence such as inattention and failure to maintain a safe distance. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing or degenerative, and that the plaintiffs' own negligence contributed to the incident. The case went to trial, resulting in a jury verdict for the plaintiffs.
One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The case was tried on damages only. The jury awarded the injured driver compensation for past physical pain and mental anguish, past loss of earning capacity, and past medical care.
One driver was stopped at a light when the other driver hit them from behind. The injured driver went to the emergency room with neck and back pain. A chiropractor stated the driver would have permanent pain. The jury awarded money for medical bills and pain. The case later settled for a higher amount.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages for past physical pain, mental anguish, and past medical care.
A three-car collision occurred. The case was tried to determine damages. The jury awarded money for past physical pain, past medical care, and past physical impairment.
A person was walking in a store parking lot when they were struck by a car. The injured person claimed back and neck injuries. The driver was accused of speeding and not paying attention. The defense argued the injured person was also at fault for wearing dark clothing and not looking out for traffic.
One driver ran a stop sign and hit another car at an intersection. The driver who was hit claimed neck and back injuries that were aggravated by the accident. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing and degenerative.
Two drivers were involved in a collision in Houston, Texas. One driver alleged the other driver was negligent in operating their vehicle, leading to the crash and injuries. The injured driver received treatment for neck, back, shoulder, elbow, knee, leg, and foot injuries. After a trial, one driver was found to be 100% at fault, and damages were awarded for past medical expenses and vehicle damage.
A collision occurred when one driver disregarded a stop sign and struck another vehicle. The insurance company for the struck vehicle paid damages to its insured. The insurance company then filed a lawsuit against the driver who ran the stop sign and the vehicle owner, alleging negligence and vicarious liability. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the insurance company, awarding damages.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle reported neck and back injuries. The jury found the defendant driver at fault and awarded damages for past medical care and pain.
Dallas County • 2022
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.