One driver ran into the back of another vehicle stopped at a red light. The injured driver claimed serious neck and back injuries. The drivers settled, but the injured driver's insurance company denied additional underinsured motorist benefits. A jury awarded the injured driver more compensation.
One driver was traveling eastbound when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit sued, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense argued comparative responsibility and other defenses. The jury found the defendant driver's negligence caused the injuries and awarded damages.
One driver was making a signaled left turn into a private driveway when another driver attempted to pass on the left and collided with the side of the first vehicle. The first driver claimed neck pain and radiating arm pain, with loss of sensation in his dominant hand.
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended their pickup truck. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The defense argued the shoulder injury was pre-existing. The case was tried as a bench trial.
One driver alleged the other driver was negligent and hit their vehicle from behind. The injured driver sustained neck, back, and shoulder injuries requiring surgery. The second driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent of the injuries and damages, suggesting a pre-existing shoulder condition. The case proceeded to a bench trial.
One driver was found liable after another person was run over and dragged by a car. The injured person suffered a dislocated hip, broken ribs, and a broken nose. The defense argued the injuries were from a fight, but the jury found the driver negligent. The injured person was awarded damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver ran a stoplight and broadsided another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle claimed neck and back soft-tissue injuries and headaches. They sought damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering.
A cyclist was riding on a road under construction when his tire hit an unfinished sidewalk with deep holes and concrete beams. The cyclist crashed and suffered a broken neck, leading to his death. His family sued the construction company, alleging negligence in failing to warn of the dangerous condition and not following safety standards. The case was settled.
A pedestrian was walking in a crosswalk with a walk light when a driver turning left struck her. The pedestrian claimed injuries including a fractured foot, back strain, and disc issues. The driver's liability was not strongly disputed. The case was settled in mediation.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway in Houston, Texas. The other driver then struck the stopped vehicle from behind. The driver who was hit claimed the collision caused injuries to their neck and back. The other driver admitted to hitting the vehicle but argued the injuries were not caused by the accident. A jury awarded damages for past and future pain and suffering.
One driver stopped for traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver was not paying attention and failed to brake in time. The injured driver experienced problems with discs and nerves in their spine and underwent medical treatments.
One driver was stopped in an intersection, preparing to make a left turn, when another driver collided with the rear of her vehicle. This impact pushed the first vehicle into oncoming traffic, causing a head-on collision with a third vehicle. The drivers of the first two vehicles claimed various injuries, including strains to their backs and necks, and soft-tissue injuries. The plaintiffs alleged the third driver failed to maintain a proper lookout or control his speed. The defense argued the first driver's turn signal and brake lights were not on, and the second driver failed to take evasive action.
Hood County • 2016
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.