2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was going through an intersection with a green light when the other driver ran a red light and hit her car. The driver who ran the red light was found negligent. The injured driver suffered a thumb fracture, concussion, and neck injuries.

One person filed a lawsuit against another after an incident that caused personal injuries. The lawsuit sought damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other losses. The defendant denied the allegations and raised a defense regarding medical expense limitations. The case went to trial, and a jury found in favor of the person who filed the lawsuit. The jury awarded general damages, and the court awarded attorney fees and costs.

One driver was approaching an intersection when the other driver attempted a left turn and they collided. The first driver claimed lower back injuries, stating the other driver failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and made an unsafe turn. The second driver admitted to making a mistake but argued the first driver could have braked sooner. The injured driver had a history of back issues and sought treatment including chiropractic care and injections. Medical experts offered differing opinions on the extent of the injuries and the necessity of further treatment.

One driver was making a left turn when the other driver struck their vehicle. The injured driver claimed lower back injuries, including aggravation of pre-existing conditions. Medical opinions differed on the extent of the injuries and the necessity of future surgery. The jury found both drivers partially at fault.

One driver turned right at an intersection and struck the other driver's vehicle. The injured driver alleged the other driver was negligent for failing to control speed, drive in a single lane, change lanes unsafely, keep a proper lookout, and disregard a stop signal. The jury found the turning driver negligent.

One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved disputes over the extent of the injuries and whether they were caused by the accident or pre-existing conditions. The jury determined the total damages.

One driver was traveling when their vehicle was struck in the rear by another driver. The injured driver experienced neck and back problems. The case involved claims for additional insurance benefits after settlements with the at-fault driver and the injured driver's own insurance company did not fully cover the damages. The jury determined the injured driver was entitled to past and future damages.

One driver was stopped when the driver behind them failed to keep a proper lookout and collided with the stopped vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended filed a lawsuit alleging negligence. The defendants argued that the plaintiff's damages were due to other causes and that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent. A jury found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded damages.

One business partner claimed the other partner fraudulently added a third person to their company and took money from the business. The first partner invested money and did not receive profits. The other partners denied the allegations. The jury found for the first partner on a civil theft claim.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle on a freeway in Beaumont. The injured driver had a pre-existing neck condition that was allegedly aggravated by the collision. The injured driver underwent neck surgery following the accident. The case proceeded to trial on causation and damages.

One driver was making a right turn from a feeder road when they collided with another vehicle in the right lane. The driver in the right lane claimed injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder, including a herniated disc. Medical treatment included physical therapy, chiropractic care, injections, and potentially future surgery. The injured driver also claimed lost wages.

One driver was stopped in a turn lane when the other driver hit them from behind. The first driver claimed the second driver was speeding and following too closely. The second driver argued the first driver caused the crash. The jury found both drivers negligent, assigning more fault to the second driver.