Houston Jury Finds Split Liability, Awards $155,000 in Left-Turn Crash
One driver was approaching an intersection when the other driver attempted a left turn and they collided. The first driver claimed lower back injuries, stating the other driver failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and made an unsafe turn. The second driver admitted to making a mistake but argued the first driver could have braked sooner. The injured driver had a history of back issues and sought treatment including chiropractic care and injections. Medical experts offered differing opinions on the extent of the injuries and the necessity of further treatment.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $155,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $155,000 is near the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In August 2013, a collision occurred at the intersection of Cambridge Street and Holly Hall Street in Houston. The plaintiff, operating a 1996 Jeep Cherokee, struck a Volkswagen Beetle driven by the defendant. The incident happened as the defendant attempted an unprotected left turn across the plaintiff's path. The defendant apologized at the scene for causing the accident.
The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant for negligence, alleging a failure to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe left turn. The plaintiff claimed lower back injuries, specifically an aggravation of pre-existing herniated discs. Medical records indicated the plaintiff had previous lumbar injuries and disc herniations. Following the collision, the plaintiff underwent chiropractic treatment, sought opinions from orthopedic surgeons, and received epidural steroid injections for ongoing pain. The plaintiff sought $750,000 in damages, including $150,000 for future medical expenses, as well as compensation for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
The defendant admitted to an unsafe turn but contended that the plaintiff was also partially at fault for not applying the brakes quickly enough to avoid the collision. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, opined that the plaintiff's treatment was excessive and that any lumbar injuries sustained were limited to soft-tissue sprains and strains, not new herniations. The defense suggested a minimal award of $8,000 if the jury reached the question of damages.
After a two-day trial and five hours of deliberation, the jury found both parties negligent. The jury attributed 90 percent of the responsibility to the defendant and 10 percent to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $155,000. Due to the finding of comparative responsibility, the final judgment for the plaintiff was reduced to $139,500.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.