One driver was merging onto a highway when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The injured driver stated the collision caused injuries to the discs in their neck and back, requiring medical treatment. The jury found the second driver's negligence caused harm to the first driver.
One driver was stopped in heavy traffic when another driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries, including herniated discs in their lower back and neck pain. The other driver admitted fault at the scene. The injured driver sought damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering. The defense argued the injuries were not as severe as claimed and could be related to pre-existing conditions or a prior accident.
One driver was merging onto a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their neck and back discs, requiring medical treatment. The other driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the severity of the injuries. The jury found the second driver's actions caused harm to the first driver.
A 73-year-old man was rear-ended by another driver while driving his pickup truck. The collision caused the man's head to strike the back window. He was taken to the hospital and treated for neck, back, and head injuries, including a concussion and aggravation of pre-existing arthritis. The defense admitted fault for the accident. The jury awarded the man $33,678 for medical expenses and pain and suffering.
One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while driving in Marshall. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, and head, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense stipulated to liability. The injured driver sought damages for past medical expenses, past and future physical pain, and past and future physical impairment.
One driver struck the rear of another vehicle, causing it to leave the road and roll into a ditch. The first driver claimed the second driver was following too closely and speeding. The second driver argued the first driver made a sudden lane change. The jury found both drivers partially at fault for the collision.
One driver struck the rear of another vehicle, causing it to leave the road and roll into a ditch. The driver who was struck suffered neck and back injuries, as well as headaches and nerve issues. The passenger in the struck vehicle also sustained neck and back injuries, along with nerve damage. The jury found both drivers partially at fault for the collision.
One driver was traveling on a highway when they slowed for traffic. The other driver, who was allegedly texting and speeding, crashed into the back of the first vehicle, pushing it into the vehicle in front. The first driver filed a lawsuit alleging negligence. The case went to trial, and the jury found the second driver negligent, awarding damages for past physical pain and medical expenses. The court entered a final judgment.
One driver was stopped or moving slowly on Highway 75 in Dallas when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another car. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case went to trial, and the jury awarded damages.
One driver was found negligent after a rear-end collision. The injured person sustained neck and back injuries. The jury awarded damages for past medical care.
A three-car collision occurred. One driver was found negligent. The injured person received compensation for past physical pain, mental anguish, and past medical care.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
Harris County • 2019
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.