One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver struck her vehicle. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries, including numbness and facial drooping. The defense argued the Bell's palsy was not related to the accident. The jury found the at-fault driver negligent.
One driver's car was damaged in a rear-end collision. The car was taken for repairs, but the owner could not pay the bill. The repair shop kept the car and later obtained a judgment for the unpaid bill. The car owner then sued the repair shop. The court imposed sanctions against the repair shop for discovery abuse, leading to a default judgment. A jury then awarded the car owner damages for loss of use and loss in market value.
One driver was traveling in the right lane of a Houston street when their car was involved in a sideswipe collision with a pickup truck. The driver of the car claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the pickup truck driver was negligent in operating their vehicle, stating the truck suddenly entered the right lane and initiated the collision. The defense argued it was an accident and no one was negligent, or that the injured driver was speeding.
One driver was traveling in the right lane of a Houston street when their car was sideswiped by another vehicle. The collision caused the first driver's car to strike a curb. The driver claimed injuries to their back and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. Medical treatment included chiropractic care and physical therapy. The driver sought damages for past medical expenses, pain, and impairment. The defense argued the accident was minor and questioned the extent of the injuries, noting a prior back injury and inconsistent treatment compliance. The jury found both drivers partially responsible for the accident.
One driver failed to control their vehicle and caused a chain-reaction collision involving multiple other vehicles. The initial collision led to subsequent impacts as vehicles attempted to avoid the crash. One of the involved parties' insurers paid benefits and then filed a lawsuit seeking damages for property damage and other costs.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended her vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to her neck and back. The second driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the severity of the injuries. A jury awarded the first driver $8,130 in damages.
One driver was traveling west on a road when they struck the rear side of a truck that was attempting a U-turn. The driver who struck the truck claimed injuries to their shoulder, neck, and back. Medical evaluations revealed disc herniations in the lower back and diagnosed strains and sprains in the neck. The driver sought recovery for past medical bills.
One driver was slowing down in traffic when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and knee injuries. The defense argued the injured driver braked unnecessarily hard. Medical bills totaled over $9,000. The jury awarded $8,083.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The jury found the driver who caused the crash responsible for the other driver's injuries. The injured driver was awarded money for past medical care and pain and suffering.
One driver was traveling west on a road with one lane in each direction and a center turn lane. The other driver was traveling north and stopped at a stop sign. The driver who stopped proceeded into the intersection and collided with the other driver. The police report indicated the driver who stopped failed to yield the right of way. The injured driver claimed knee, neck, shoulder, hip, and ankle injuries. The jury found both drivers at fault.
One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The case was tried solely on the issue of damages. The jury awarded compensation for past medical care.
Dallas County • 2019
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.