One driver was towing his disabled truck with his wife's truck when another driver rear-ended the disabled truck. The disabled truck's hazard lights were reportedly not working. The driver of the disabled truck sued the other driver for negligence, claiming the other driver failed to control speed and took faulty evasive action. The other driver denied negligence and argued the disabled truck driver was more responsible for the accident due to towing the vehicle at night without hazard lights. The injured driver claimed aggravation of pre-existing disc issues and sought damages for pain, suffering, and future medical bills.
One driver was riding in a vehicle being towed when the other driver struck them from behind. The first driver's vehicle had its hazard and emergency lights on. The driver who was struck alleged the other driver was speeding, not paying attention, and failed to brake in time. The second driver argued the accident was unavoidable and the first driver was also at fault. The jury found both drivers partially responsible for the collision.
A three-car collision occurred, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The jury awarded compensation for past medical expenses and past physical impairment for both individuals involved.
One driver was traveling on a highway when the other driver lost control of their vehicle. The out-of-control vehicle struck the median and then veered back into the lane, hitting the first vehicle on the side and rear. The first driver claimed the other driver was speeding and not maintaining a safe distance. The second driver argued the injuries were not related to the accident.
One driver was traveling on a highway when the other driver lost control of their vehicle. The first vehicle then struck the median and collided with the side and rear of the other vehicle. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and mental anguish.
A child riding as a passenger was injured when the car they were in was hit from behind. The collision caused a chain reaction, pushing the child's car into the car in front of it. The child suffered a concussion and required medical treatment.
One driver was stopped when their vehicle was hit from behind in a chain reaction collision. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver was negligent for not paying attention, following too closely, and being distracted. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their head, neck, back, and knee. The other driver denied negligence and argued the injuries were exaggerated or caused by other drivers.
One driver was stopped or slowing to turn when the vehicle behind her struck her car. The driver of the rear vehicle received a ticket for failing to control her speed. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries, including aggravation of pre-existing conditions. She underwent surgery for a torn rotator cuff and treated for her back and neck pain. The defense argued the shoulder tear was degenerative and unrelated to the accident.
One driver was found negligent after a rear-end collision. The crash caused injuries to the neck and back, along with general bodily harm. The jury awarded damages for past pain, impairment, medical care, and lost wages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver crashed into the back of their vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended suffered multiple serious injuries requiring medical treatment.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver failed to stop and crashed into the back of their vehicle. The injured driver suffered multiple serious injuries requiring medical treatment. The case proceeded to trial, and a jury awarded damages.
One driver stopped at a traffic signal was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, including disc injuries. The passenger also claimed injuries to their neck and back discs. The driver who was hit from behind was awarded damages for medical costs and pain and suffering. The passenger was also awarded damages for medical costs and pain and suffering.
Harris County • 2019
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
