2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver failed to control their speed and rear-ended another vehicle in Houston, Texas. The occupants of the struck vehicle sustained personal injuries and filed a lawsuit. They alleged the other driver was negligent in several ways. The case proceeded to a default judgment against the driver who caused the collision.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle while traveling on a highway. The occupants of the struck vehicle sustained personal injuries and filed a lawsuit. They alleged the other driver was negligent in failing to maintain proper lookout and control of their vehicle. The case proceeded to trial, and a default judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs.

One driver's vehicle collided with another vehicle from behind on a road in Cypress, Texas. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver failed to yield the right of way and maintain a proper lookout. The collision resulted in serious injuries to the occupants of the hit vehicle. The case went to a jury trial, which found in favor of the plaintiffs.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle, causing a multi-vehicle collision. The jury found the defendant negligent. The injured person received damages for past medical care and past physical pain.

A multi-car collision occurred where one driver rear-ended another. The jury found the defendant at fault. The injured person sustained neck and back injuries, along with general bodily injuries.

One driver's vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle while stopped. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their backs and necks. One child sustained vertebral fractures requiring fusion. The case was settled.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who was rear-ended and their passengers sustained neck and back injuries. The driver who caused the collision claimed brake failure, while the vehicle owner claimed the driver was not authorized to use the vehicle. The court found the vehicle owner negligent.

One driver was traveling north on a highway when they were involved in a three-vehicle rear-end collision. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, including herniated discs. The case involved claims of negligence against one of the other drivers, with a defense argument of comparative negligence. The jury awarded damages, but the amount was reduced due to comparative negligence.

One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver struck their vehicle from behind, pushing it into a third vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed neck and back injuries. The case involved a dispute over the necessity of extensive physical therapy and the extent of the injuries sustained.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The case was tried on damages only. The jury awarded compensation for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, physical impairment, and medical care for both occupants of the struck vehicle.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver failed to stop and rear-ended their vehicle. The injured driver claimed the collision caused knee and neck injuries requiring future surgery. The other driver denied fault and claimed the injuries were not serious. The jury found the at-fault driver 100% liable.

One driver stopped at a crosswalk and was hit from behind by another driver. The driver who caused the collision admitted fault. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back and shoulder. The jury found the at-fault driver 100% responsible and awarded damages for medical bills, future medical bills, physical impairment, pain and suffering, and lost wages.