One driver was traveling eastbound and slowed for traffic when the other driver collided with the rear of their vehicle. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the car in front of it. The injured driver suffered a blow to the head, lost consciousness, and was diagnosed with a concussion, broken ribs, collarbone, and pelvis. They now experience memory loss and balance issues.
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by the other driver. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The defense questioned the extent of the injuries and the necessity of the treatment received.
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries with nerve symptoms. She sought damages for past medical bills, pain, and impairment. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing and degenerative, and that any treatment beyond initial visits was unnecessary. The jury found the at-fault driver negligent and awarded damages.
One driver slowed their vehicle to make a turn and was struck from behind by another driver. The driver who was hit alleged injuries to their neck and back. The jury found in favor of the drivers who were hit.
One driver slowed their vehicle to make a turn and was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed they sustained neck and back injuries. The driver who caused the collision admitted fault for the crash but disputed the severity of the injuries claimed.
One driver crashed into the rear of another vehicle. The driver who caused the crash allegedly fled the scene and was later found to be unlicensed and using a cell phone. The owner of the vehicle driven by the at-fault driver was also named in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs sought compensation for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The jury found both drivers negligent, with the plaintiff driver being partially at fault.
One driver crashed into the back of another vehicle that had passengers. The driver who caused the crash allegedly fled the scene and was not properly trained or supervised by their employer. The employer was accused of negligent hiring and supervision. The case involved claims for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The jury found both drivers and one of the passengers negligent.
One driver crashed into the back of another vehicle on Interstate 10 in Harris County, Texas. The collision caused property damage and personal injuries to the driver of the struck vehicle. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other losses. The other driver argued that the injuries were pre-existing or not caused by the accident. A jury found in favor of the injured driver and awarded damages.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The crash caused injuries to the occupants of the struck vehicle, including neck and back issues. The jury determined fault for both drivers.
One driver was slowing for traffic on an exit ramp when the other driver rear-ended them. The passenger in the slowed vehicle struck their head and sustained injuries to their face, neck, and head. The jury found the defendant's negligence caused the plaintiff's harm.
One driver was slowing for traffic on an exit ramp when the other driver rear-ended them. The passenger in the struck vehicle hit their head on the dashboard. The passenger reported pain in their face, neck, and head, and was diagnosed with facial contusions, lacerations, headaches, and a cervical sprain. They continued to treat for neck and back pain and were diagnosed with cervical radiculitis, cervicalgia, cervical and thoracic sprain, shoulder sprain, and lumbar muscle spasms.
One driver was traveling west on Interstate 30 when another driver rear-ended him. The impact caused the first driver's vehicle to strike a roadside concrete barrier. The second driver was later convicted of driving while intoxicated. The first driver claimed neck and back injuries.
Dallas County • 2015
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.