One driver was traveling eastbound when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit sued, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense argued comparative responsibility and other defenses. The jury found the defendant driver's negligence caused the injuries and awarded damages.
One driver alleged the other driver was negligent and hit their vehicle from behind. The injured driver sustained neck, back, and shoulder injuries requiring surgery. The second driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent of the injuries and damages, suggesting a pre-existing shoulder condition. The case proceeded to a bench trial.
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended their pickup truck. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The defense argued the shoulder injury was pre-existing. The case was tried as a bench trial.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway in Houston, Texas. The other driver then struck the stopped vehicle from behind. The driver who was hit claimed the collision caused injuries to their neck and back. The other driver admitted to hitting the vehicle but argued the injuries were not caused by the accident. A jury awarded damages for past and future pain and suffering.
One driver stopped for traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver was not paying attention and failed to brake in time. The injured driver experienced problems with discs and nerves in their spine and underwent medical treatments.
One driver stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended them. The first driver sued, alleging the second driver was negligent. The case involved multiple trial settings and sanctions against the defendant for failing to comply with court orders. A default judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff.
A passenger in a pickup truck was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The passenger claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck. The other driver's insurer settled the claim. The passenger then sued her own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver's negligence caused the accident. The defense argued the passenger's husband stopped suddenly, causing the collision.
One driver was stopped waiting to make a left turn when the other driver rear-ended her vehicle. The driver who was hit alleged serious injuries to her neck, back, and legs. The other driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent of the injuries.
A three-vehicle collision occurred, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The jury awarded compensation for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and impairment. The award also covered past and future medical care.
One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver crashed into the back of a vehicle, pushing it into the stopped vehicle. The collision caused severe and permanent injuries to one driver, including neck pain and ringing in the ears. The police cited the second driver for failure to control speed. The injured driver sued, alleging negligence and seeking damages for medical expenses, pain, and lost wages. The defense claimed the injured driver was also at fault and that a third party contributed to the accident. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their vehicle was hit from behind by a police cruiser. The driver claimed the police officer was negligent and caused injuries including disc displacement and nerve irritation. The jury found the officer negligent and awarded damages for past and future harm.
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the vehicle in front of it. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck.
Dallas County • 2019
Geography
Where Texas Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Texas.
Key legal rules that affect how Texas car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 property damage
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
The state requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is optional but recommended.
Texas has no cap on personal injury damages in most car accident cases, though punitive damages are capped at the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.
FAQ
Texas Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Texas case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Texas attorney for guidance specific to your situation.