2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was stopped at a red light when another vehicle rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed the accident caused bulging discs in her neck and back, with the neck injuries contacting her spinal cord. She sought damages for pain, impairment, and lost earnings. The defense argued the disc bulges were age-related and degenerative.

One driver rear-ended another driver on a Houston street. The first driver claimed the second driver was inattentive and failed to maintain a proper lookout and control of their vehicle. The second driver alleged the first driver cut them off and stopped suddenly. The injured driver claimed herniated discs in their neck and back, along with shoulder and knee pain, requiring medical treatment and potentially surgery.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while traveling on a highway. The collision caused the injured driver to briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed to have suffered a concussion and disc injuries, while the other driver argued the injuries were only soft tissue damage. The jury found the driver who caused the collision to be negligent.

One driver was traveling eastbound when the vehicle behind them failed to notice slowed traffic and rear-ended it, pushing it into the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff experienced immediate pain in their left shoulder and arm, followed by neck and back pain. Diagnostic tests revealed injuries to the biceps tendon, rotator cuff, and spinal discs. The plaintiff underwent surgery for the shoulder and spine, with a future lumbar fusion recommended.

One driver was involved in a rear-end collision. The case was tried on damages only. The jury awarded the injured person compensation for past and future physical pain, past and future physical impairment, past medical care, and past loss of earning capacity.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle sustained various injuries, including neck, back, and shoulder issues. The jury found the defendant driver negligent and awarded damages.

One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.

One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended them. The passenger in the stopped vehicle claimed neck and back injuries. The court granted a directed verdict for the passenger on liability. The passenger sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, and impairment. The jury awarded the passenger $204,235.

One driver stopped at a traffic light and was hit from behind by another vehicle. The person in the stopped car claimed injuries to their neck and lower back, which were confirmed by an MRI. They underwent chiropractic care and were recommended injections, which they were hesitant to receive. The jury awarded damages for past and future medical bills, physical impairment, and pain and suffering.

A passenger in a stopped car was rear-ended by another vehicle. The passenger experienced pain and had disc injuries in their neck and lower back. Medical expenses were over $16,000. The case went to a jury, which awarded over $204,000.

A pickup truck carrying a passenger was stopped in traffic when an SUV rear-ended it, causing it to hit another SUV. The passenger suffered neck and leg injuries, as well as hip and arm pain. She now uses a cane and has reduced independence. The driver of the SUV admitted to using a cell phone at the time of the crash.

One driver stopped in traffic and was hit from behind by another driver. The impact pushed the first car into the vehicle in front. The passenger in the first car had a pre-existing hip injury that was aggravated by the collision. The passenger claimed increased pain and limitations, requiring a cane. The other driver argued the impact was minor and the passenger did not seek further treatment.