2,421 Texas car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver filed a lawsuit against another driver after an incident that resulted in damages. The case proceeded to litigation, and a jury trial was held. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the driver who filed the lawsuit, awarding them general damages. The court entered a judgment based on the jury's verdict and also awarded attorneys' fees and costs.

One driver was traveling north and another driver was in the left lane. The driver in the left lane attempted to turn right, and the front of the first driver's car hit the front right wheel of the second driver's truck. The first driver claimed neck, back, shoulder, and arm injuries, and the passenger claimed neck, back, shoulder, arm, and leg injuries.

One driver was involved in a collision. The case involved injuries to the neck and back.

One driver was involved in a collision. The case involved injuries to the neck and back.

One driver failed to control their speed and struck the back of another vehicle. The injured driver sought compensation for pain, medical expenses, and lost earning capacity. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable and the injured driver was partially at fault. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.

One party entered into a contract for a vehicle and then defaulted on payments. The other party located the vehicle for repairs and refused to return it, demanding payment. The first party sought possession of the vehicle and clear title. The repair shop defended their right to retain the vehicle. After a trial, the court awarded possession to the first party but also awarded damages to the repair shop for services rendered. The first party's motion for a new trial was granted, vacating the award to the repair shop.

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle incident. The case resulted in a settlement.

One driver was involved in a collision with another vehicle. The case resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

A young boy was injured while riding an all-terrain vehicle at his grandparents' ranch. He crashed into a utility pole and sustained a fracture to his left arm. His father sued the boy's mother and grandparents, alleging negligence and failure to supervise. The defense argued the Recreational Use Statute applied and that the injury was not severe. The case settled for $20,000.

One driver's vehicle was damaged in a collision caused by another driver. The injured party's insurer paid for the damages and then filed a complaint against the at-fault driver and the vehicle owner. The insurer alleged negligence and wrongful entrustment. Following a bench trial, the court ruled in favor of the insurer, awarding damages, interest, and costs.

One driver's vehicle was stolen at gunpoint. The driver filed claims with her insurance companies for the stolen vehicle and personal property. The insurance companies paid for the vehicle but disputed the amount for upgraded parts and rejected the personal property claim. The driver sued for breach of contract and other violations. The jury found that the insurance company did not fail to pay benefits under the contract, and the driver took nothing.

One driver was involved in a collision. The other driver was also involved. The collision caused injuries.