Montgomery County Settlements:
Real Case Outcomes & Data

A driver was stopped at a traffic signal when the vehicle behind him, an 18-wheeler, rear-ended his pickup truck. The driver of the pickup truck claimed he suffered neck injuries, including a herniated disc, which caused radiating pain and numbness. He underwent various treatments, including physical therapy and injections, and sought compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and pain and suffering. The defense disputed the cause of the injuries and the severity of the impact.

A person was walking near their home and was struck by a vehicle after dark. The driver was allegedly on the shoulder without headlights. The collision resulted in fatal injuries. The case involved claims of vehicle negligence and negligent hiring against the driver's employer.

One driver was operating a tractor-trailer and struck a sedan carrying a passenger. The passenger claimed injuries to their neck and arm. The case went to trial, and the jury found in favor of the passenger.

One driver stopped at a red light, and the other driver ran the red light and struck the first vehicle. The injured driver claimed back injuries, including a herniated disc, and sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain, and suffering. The jury found the at-fault driver negligent and grossly negligent.

One driver stopped at a red light and proceeded when it turned green. The other driver, who was texting, ran the red light and struck the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed back injuries and sued for negligence.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a stoplight. The injured driver claimed neck injuries. The defense argued that a subsequent accident caused the injuries. The case involved disputes over the extent and cause of the injuries, with the defense pointing to a later collision as the primary cause. The injured driver sought damages for medical bills and pain and suffering.

One driver was turning left when they collided with another driver going straight through an intersection. The driver going straight claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The other driver's estate argued that a brain tumor caused the accident.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended her. The driver who was hit claimed injuries including neck pain, headaches, back pain, and a torn rotator cuff. The other driver argued that the injured driver braked too suddenly. The jury found both drivers partially at fault.

One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.

One driver was stopped behind another vehicle on a feeder road after exiting a highway when their car was hit from behind. The impact pushed the driver's car into the vehicle in front. The driver claimed to have suffered permanent cervical and lumbar injuries confirmed by an MRI. The other driver argued that rainy conditions caused the collision and denied the extent of the claimed injuries, pointing to the driver's prior chiropractic treatments. The jury found the defendant driver fully responsible for the crash.

One driver stopped behind a truck at a traffic light when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The impact propelled the vehicle forward into the truck. The injured person claimed a back injury that would cause permanent pain and limitations. The other driver argued the accident was unavoidable or that injuries had resolved.

One driver stopped behind a truck at a traffic light when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The impact pushed the stopped vehicle into the truck. The injured person claimed a herniated disc requiring injections and resulting in permanent pain and limitations. The jury found the defendant driver fully responsible.