The Woodlands Jury Awards $517,285 in Red-Light Collision
One driver stopped at a red light and proceeded when it turned green. The other driver, who was texting, ran the red light and struck the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed back injuries and sued for negligence.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $517,285
- County
- Montgomery County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $517,285 is above the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A motorist was awarded $517,285 in a case stemming from a 2013 car accident in The Woodlands. On October 20, 2013, the plaintiff, a telecommunications consultant, was driving a 2006 BMW sedan. While proceeding through an intersection after a red light turned green, the plaintiff's vehicle was struck by a 2013 Hyundai SUV driven by the defendant, who ran a red light while texting. The impact spun the plaintiff's vehicle 180 degrees. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated a congenital back defect and caused or aggravated a herniated disc, requiring future lumbar surgery.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for gross negligence, alleging texting while driving, failing to keep a proper lookout, running a red light, and failing to yield the right of way. Evidence presented included the defendant's prior rear-end collision caused by distracted driving. The plaintiff's counsel argued this demonstrated the defendant's awareness of extreme risk and conscious indifference. An orthopedic surgeon testified that the plaintiff would require future medical treatment, including a laminectomy and fusion. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain, mental anguish, physical impairment, and punitive damages.
The defense did not dispute negligence but contested the claim of gross negligence, arguing no evidence of the defendant's subjective conscious indifference was presented, as the defendant was not present at trial and was not questioned on the matter during a deposition. The defense also challenged the plaintiff's injury claims, highlighting multiple inconsistent statements in medical records regarding the accident's circumstances and an entry attributing back aggravation to a vacation activity. The defense noted a period of no treatment for the plaintiff prior to trial.
After a two-day trial, a jury found the defendant both negligent and grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $517,285.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Montgomery County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Montgomery County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.