Conroe Judge Awards $1,738,322 in Fatal Pedestrian Accident
A person was walking near their home and was struck by a vehicle after dark. The driver was allegedly on the shoulder without headlights. The collision resulted in fatal injuries. The case involved claims of vehicle negligence and negligent hiring against the driver's employer.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Spinal Cord Injury Injuries
Spinal cord injuries are among the most catastrophic outcomes of car accidents, potentially resulting in partial or complete paralysis. These injuries require extensive medical care and significantly impact quality of life.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1,738,322
- County
- Montgomery County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Auto/Pedestrian Collision
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $1,738,322 is below the median of $25,955,498 for spinal cord injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,000,000 to $67,470,000, based on 23 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A 27-year-old pedestrian sustained fatal injuries after being struck by a vehicle operated by a restaurant employee in Conroe, Texas. The incident occurred after dark as the pedestrian attempted to cross a multi-lane roadway near his residence. The pedestrian was rendered unconscious from massive blunt force trauma and died two days later. The plaintiff, representing the decedent's estate, subsequently filed a motor vehicle negligence lawsuit against the driver and the driver's employer. Prior to trial, the driver settled his personal liability for $30,000, and the case proceeded against the restaurant defendant.
The plaintiff alleged the defendant driver was traveling on the shoulder of the road without activated headlights. Surveillance footage from a nearby gas station captured the incident. The plaintiff argued that the footage, though dark, showed the decedent carrying a white plastic bag visible until the moment of impact, and no headlights were discernible from the striking vehicle. The plaintiff further contended that the driver's credibility was suspect, noting the driver's blood test revealed THC and inconsistent testimony regarding marijuana use. Additionally, the plaintiff asserted the restaurant negligently hired and failed to adequately train the driver.
The defendant driver denied traveling on the shoulder or operating the vehicle without headlights. The restaurant defendant maintained that the plaintiff's claims for lost earning capacity, estimated at approximately $760,000, were unduly speculative, despite testimony that the decedent was pursuing an associate's degree. The decedent had spina bifida, but his mother testified he could walk at a normal pace. The case was tried before the court under COVID-19 protocols. The court found in favor of the plaintiff and entered a final judgment, awarding $1,738,322. The outcome indicated the court accepted the plaintiff's presentation of the incident's circumstances and the defendant's liability.
Understanding This Case
- Spinal cord injuries are typically permanent, though some incomplete injuries may see partial recovery. Life expectancy may be reduced, and quality of life is significantly impacted.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Montgomery County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2021, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Montgomery County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.