The Woodlands, Texas Jury Awards $517,285 in Texting Collision
One driver stopped at a red light, and the other driver ran the red light and struck the first vehicle. The injured driver claimed back injuries, including a herniated disc, and sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain, and suffering. The jury found the at-fault driver negligent and grossly negligent.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $517,285
- County
- Montgomery County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $517,285 is above the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On October 20, 2013, a collision occurred in The Woodlands, Texas, when the plaintiff, a telecommunications consultant, was driving a 2006 BMW sedan. The plaintiff proceeded through an intersection after a light turned green, when a 2013 Hyundai SUV, driven by the defendant, ran a red light while texting and struck the plaintiff's vehicle. The impact caused the plaintiff's vehicle to spin 180 degrees, and the plaintiff claimed back injuries.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent and grossly negligent for texting while driving, failing to maintain a proper lookout, running a red light, and failing to yield the right of way. The plaintiff argued the defendant's prior involvement in a rear-end collision while using a GPS demonstrated an awareness of risk, indicating conscious indifference at the time of the current accident. The plaintiff claimed the collision aggravated a congenital back defect and caused or aggravated a herniated disc, requiring future surgery. The defense did not dispute negligence but contested gross negligence, arguing there was no evidence of subjective conscious indifference. The defense also challenged the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, citing inconsistent statements in medical records about the accident's cause and a gap in treatment prior to trial.
Following a two-day trial and 2.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant both negligent and grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $517,285. This amount included damages for past and future medical expenses, past and future physical impairment, past and future physical pain and mental anguish, and punitive damages.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Montgomery County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Montgomery County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.