292 New York car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The person in the rear-ended vehicle sustained a back injury. The case was settled.

One driver was stopped at an intersection when another driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who was hit claimed the impact caused permanent injuries, including disc bulges and herniations in their neck and lower back. They underwent surgery for their neck injuries. The other driver argued the plaintiff stopped abruptly and that the injuries were pre-existing. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.

One driver hit another vehicle from behind. The person in the first vehicle sustained injuries to their back and shoulder. The case went to a jury.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The crash caused injuries. The case was settled.

One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was hit from behind in a chain-reaction crash. The driver claimed injuries to their back, neck, shoulders, and knees, requiring surgery. The other driver questioned the extent of the injuries, noting minimal damage to the plaintiff's car. The case involved a dispute over whether the accident caused the claimed medical issues and future lost earnings.

One driver stopped at a red light and was hit from behind by another driver. The second driver claimed the first driver stopped short after the intersection. The first driver stated that even if that were true, the second driver was still at fault for following too closely. The first driver said she suffered injuries to her neck and back that required surgery and caused permanent pain and limitations.

A driver was rear-ended at a stop light and sued the other driver. The collision caused significant damage to the first driver's car and resulted in injuries to their spine. The case went to trial to determine damages, as liability was already established. The jury awarded a substantial amount for pain and suffering and medical expenses.

A valet driver was involved in a rear-end collision. He claimed the accident caused a cervical herniation requiring surgery and aggravated a pre-existing lumbar herniation, also requiring surgery. He stated these injuries made him permanently unable to return to his previous work. The other driver argued the collision was minor and disputed the extent of the injuries. The case settled for $1,500,000.

One driver stopped his vehicle on the side of the road to inspect a trailer hitch. The other driver, operating a truck, struck the trailer from behind, pushing it into the first driver and his vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries from the collision.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the truck driver behind them hit their car. The impact pushed the first car into the car in front of it. The driver who was hit suffered neck injuries that required surgery. They also had knee injuries that improved after surgery. The other driver claimed the first driver stopped suddenly. The case settled.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The injured person sustained back injuries. The case resulted in a jury verdict for the plaintiff.

A passenger in a van was injured when the van she was in was hit from behind. The passenger claimed back injuries, knee injuries requiring surgery, and emotional distress. The other driver argued the collision was minor and that the passenger's injuries were from prior incidents. The jury found in favor of the passenger.